Human Science and History

"The mission of a historian is to understand the past, and human scientists are trying to change the future." How accurate are these fields of knowledge? As historians study chronologically, write and write events, or arrange events in that order, people understand what is in front of them. No one wonders what is being written, but we accept it as a fact and accept it from the fact we learned. Change the future

The fields of knowledge (mathematics, natural sciences, humanities, history, religious knowledge systems, indigenous knowledge systems, arts and ethics): how to acquire their own nature and knowledge, the type of each requirement and consideration What is the problem (eg, how do scientific methods know that it is an effective way to master knowledge?), "What is the reason for learning historical knowledge, Do you apply to it? "I had knowledge in six fields of mathematics, natural science, humanities, history, art, ethics In the fall of 2014, the IB program is a knowledge system on religion and a knowledge system by indigenous people It has been changed to include two additional knowledge fields.

The history of science is a study on the development of science and scientific knowledge including natural science and social science. Science is a collection of experiences, theories, and practical knowledge about the natural world, created by scientists who emphasize the observation, interpretation and prediction of phenomena in the real world. In contrast, scientific historiography studies the method used by scientific historians.

• Does scientific knowledge progress? Does scientific knowledge grow constantly? In this respect, how does natural science compare with other knowledge fields such as history, humanities, ethics, art, etc? Is there "an end" in science? In other words, can we gain level knowledge that all scientifically important things are known? If so, what about the results? • Can you say that most scientific research exceeds the realities and concepts of the world's daily experiences such as the nature and behavior of electromagnetic fields, elementary particles, and spatiotemporal continuum? What is the substance of a scientist? Do you have a practical interpretation model or theory (eg Higgs boson, selfish guided child), or will it be useful to predict and control the natural world? What are the actual problems of these entities that may affect scientific understanding and understanding of the public? What?