Human Rights vs. Sovereignty

It was a massive heavy bombing of Serbia "NATO's first aggressive behavior, the first Allied forces of the sovereign state, the United States did not officially participate in the war, that is clearly the United Nations Security Council It is not approved, "said Northwestern University Law Professor Steven Presser. "What we did on the Balkan Peninsula is part of Vietnam's new international law theory.

Trump talked about 21 "sovereignty" in his speech. This contrasts with a single mention to "human rights". He may be it "fundamentals of various countries can promote cooperation and prosperity vision to protect its sovereignty and safeguard its safety," the United Nations said, but it is far better overall picture It is from. After the events of the United Nations and World War II terrorists there is no peace or security to support the building of consciousness that other international organizations in the United States do not have justice and fundamental human rights. Thus, in 1945 the United Nations Charter defended that in reality it was more rigid, that its "human rights and fundamental freedom" was protected, not to protect national sovereignty. In fact it is clear that we give the general assembly the responsibility to realize human rights and fundamental freedoms without distinguishing race, sex, language or religion.

In the world that has sovereignty first, it is impossible to resolve the conflict, meaningful protection of human rights abuses and the authoritarian regime is also impossible. Each country can exacerbate human rights violations, escape from external pressure and international responsibility, and suppress democratic freedom within its territory. Obviously, this is the world the playing card seeks. By emphasizing national human rights sovereignty, he will pay attention to domestic human rights violations committed by the government every day. He knows that his agenda is contrary to the human rights norm proposed by international law and his speech sends a clear signal to the world: withdrawal

In his speech, the president repeats cards, the protection of the domestic and international situation of its territory emphasizes the concept of sovereignty, which is an important principle of autonomy. Few people oppose the sovereign sanctity that helps to prevent another war after the Second World War. But now, using this concept, many of the most repressive regimes in the world, including Syria, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, the control of the Russian regime, the rules of international law and democratic voice, It is linked to human rights. They distorted the concept of sovereignty, protected the tyranny regime's interests and narrow interests, and people demanded basic rights and expressions.