Human Rights Violations of the Nike Corporation

NIKE 's human rights abuses and fierce competition among activists, especially on the Internet, made it possible for companies and governments to focus on human rights and the environment. Recent activities are focused on the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Recently Starbucks Corporation has reached an agreement that you can triple the wages of thousands of coffee farmers The victory of these groups has recently appeared. Nike is against the fight that has not shown signs of relaxation for a long time.

The company that dies is not the end of life. Companies that have to pay a ton of taxes will not violate human rights. Since the company is not a human being, there are no ethical guidelines or social obligations. The company is an inanimate object. GM does not lay off employees and layoffs do the same. The real estate bubble was caused by a major banker, not a major bank. I can not forget this. But I admit that the new economy is correct. Basic income is a socialist fairy tale. Personally, I think this is a democratic socialist approach to address the escalating problem. (Do you hold Orwell Pat?)

Responsibility for corporate complicity in direct or human rights violations has become an increasingly important concern for the promotion of human rights. Especially multinational corporations are listed as important persons in maintaining good or evil human rights, considering their economic position and international level. Under the present circumstances, the mechanism to impose legal liability on the company is not international level. On the contrary, many soft legal instruments have been trusted. The most important of them is the UN guiding principle on business and human rights. According to a possible exception to the remedies provided by the Foreign Tort Law Act, the company is only responsible for human rights abuses under the domestic laws of the country which is said to have occurred based on the company.