Human Population Destroys the Environment: Any Questions?

Joel E. Cohen said in a statement, "There are substances that were in the earth to support the number of people", others said that "the boy wanted to know the sum of 1 + 1. First, He asked a physicist, he said, "With antimatter, the answer is zero. If there is a critical mass of uranium, the other is a critical mass of uranium, which is an explosive problem. "The boy asked the biologist." She said, "We are talking about bacteria, mice and whales." How long? "Unfortunately, this boy hired an accountant.

Humans are at the intersection. Evidence can not be denied: Self-driven consumer demand for population subscriptions is not only hurting the environment - including air, water, arable land - and competing to maintain the necessary overconsumption of natural resources - each other I will destroy it. Excessive consumption is not just economic problems, but mental problems: it is economical to require labor and commercial production and distribution of goods and services to satisfy their appetite, It is spiritual and our current level for demand instead of instinct and self-impulse, not influenced by our higher nature, not synchronized with the natural renewable ability

Many human activities cause environmental pollution. The increase in population has increased the demand for natural resources. Given that the population exceeds the carrying capacity of our planet, the habitats of animals and plants are destroyed to create a room for human occupation. Huge buildings (residential and industrial roads and buildings) are at the expense of the environment. To secure space for these buildings, many trees need to lose their lives. Prosperous animals among them lose their natural habitat and eventually lose their lives. However, logging trees rarely threaten life. Is this immoral?