Human Nature versus Human Condition

Throughout the history of philosophy, there are many fundamental differences between human nature and human condition. We tend to influence human beings when considering the essence of human beings, considering the distinguishing features of mankind, including how emotions and behaviors of thinking are, human beings do not depend on nature for culture. But when we consider human conditions, we consider something including unique human characteristics including the meaning of life, death is the essence of us human beings of satisfaction and death The pursuit of impossible consciousness can not be changed Part of it

This is not a traditional view on human vulnerability. Human condition has long been considered good and evil, reason and feelings appetite, superego and identity struggle. This symbolic image comes from a million movies and cartoons, an angel of one shoulder, and another devil. Another point of view is to protect angels and devils, but leave them aside. The competing self is not on your shoulder, but there is an angel and a devil, a person who wants to become thinner, and a person who wants to eat cake alone. Research psychiatrist George Ainslie learned and we can understand these interactions themselves by drawing their comparative long-term comparative advantage, from (cake eater) to other (weight loss) It became weaker as well

Both players do not change, I assert various names and explain in this article, it is called "nature and cultivation" and "blood and environment". Those who think that human nature is genetically determined and therefore can not be changed are usually recoil elites. They tend to be open racists. At least, there is a tendency to make a race or class a fixed narration. They strongly oppose the opposite opinion that can be used to threaten the privileged position in society. Advocates of the view that most human characteristics are products of the environment are usually located to the left of the political spectrum and criticize the present social conditions. When humans join, experiments are the best way to gather evidence, so it is difficult to prove definitively both sides of the discussion

Discussions on nature and cultivation continue to be popular in social science. When applied to human culture, supporters of the "natural" aspect of discussion was to create cultural forms shared by people around human genetics. Genetic mutations and abnormalities can subsequently cause behavioral and cultural differences between and among the human populations. These differences include languages, food and clothing preferences, sexual attitudes, and so on. A supporter of the discussion on "cultivation" believes that human beings are a type of whiteboard (French is "blank slate") and everything including cultural norms is learned. This basic discussion gave insight on human nature and culture by social scientists and others, but never reached reliable conclusions.