Human equality does not trump that of Nature

I insist that the lecturer concludes that he is as natural as a human being. Using a series of examples, I point out that humans and nature are considered equal in a series of controversial aspects. Through a series of children's questions that the speaker reflects in the child, the speaker attempts to break through the meaning of natural evidence. For example. In section 6, the child asked a question seeming to be directed to the speaker: "What is this grass?" Grasp it with both hands and give it to me; how can I answer this kid I can.

This discussion is a little naughty but that suggests two important points - the laws of physics equally applies to humans as well as everything else - become idealist when writing a paper Although it is easy, these ideas and material reality (the ultimate determinant of truth!) The absolute argument against idealism is Darwin's theory of evolution. The physical reality of the earth and the sun must exist before we evolve, before our thoughts evolve. Human thought has many things in common and confirms that it has evolved as an animal on the earth. For example. We sleep, hungry, seeking happiness, avoiding suffering, loving others, and desiring sexual breeding. Idealism does not explain this - it develops with sexually breeding animals on the surface of the earth. Therefore, things are a priori. Popper 's comment about idealism is very common.

Until the eighteenth century people believed that humans are inherently inequal - the natural level of man. This hypothesis collapses with the emergence of the concept of natural rights and its assumption of equality for all people's natural order. For Plato and Aristotle, the classical formula of justice has a certain period of meaning when it gives everyone what he or she deserves, ie substantially equal meaning. Everyone deserves the same dignity and the same respect. This is now a widely held concept of importance, universality, and moral equality. It develops in the stoic school and emphasizes the early New Testament Christianity which promotes the natural equality of all reasonable beings and in principle the equality of the people in front of God.

Human equality and brotherhood love are realized only when a person is created by God. Human equality is a mental problem rather than nature, substance, or intelligence. It exists as human moral quality, human dignity, equality value of personality. On the contrary, as a body, mind, and society, as a group, as a class, as a political group, and as a member of the state people are always very inequality. If the spiritual values ​​of people - the facts of this religious nature - are not recognized, the only true basis of human equality will disappear. So, as equality becomes a simple phrase with no basis and content, it quickly retreats and faces an inequality that obeys the obvious facts of human inequality, or human and natural desires. When religious methods are removed, vacancies are subject to various forms of inequality, ie race, ethnicity, society or politics