Human Enhancement is Immoral and De-humanizing

Advances in the field of biology and technology, as well as the progress of biotechnology - biotechnology - in these two areas, are generally acclaimed by experts and non-experts. Genetically modified foods, Dolly sheep, stem cell research and therapeutic cloning are only some of the achievements in this area, changing the field of science and concerns about past, present and future developments of men and women involved in biotechnology . Mainly because it is becoming increasingly obvious that in the near future, the field may go beyond the scope of treatment and enter the stage of human strengthening.

The rise of humanity has been severely criticized by Christians; in particular, the condemnation of enrichment of the Vatican is "fundamental immorality", indicating that humans do not have sufficient rights to their biological forms It is. Concern over Christian human being's "playing God" is finally criticism that leads to arrogance, moral foolishness, and condemnation to the theme described in the Genesis of Adam, Eve and Babel. . In these stories, God never loses the real danger of power, but Patrick Hopkins thinks that arrogant criticism has turned into Prometheus' criticism given the advancement of technology. According to Hopkins, "In Greek mythology, when Prometheus stealed fire, he actually stole something, he stole the power that God alone can possess."

Thayer (2014) noted in his article "Mapping Human Enhanced Rhetoric" that the development of human enhancement technology means correspondingly increasing HET discourse, and a new classification called Human Enhancement Rhetoric (HER) I suggested inventing it. To establish this classification, Thayer focused on answering four questions. (1) What is HER? (2) How is HER mapped? (3) What is this mapping HER project? And (4) What is global? By mapping HER, can you ask questions or ethical issues or can you further understand? These basic questions will help introduce the boundaries, definitions, terms, and moral arguments of Thayer's new ideas.