How would the political process change if congressional districting were organized by strictly geographic principles instead of by the political process in state legislatures?

How is the political process changing if the division of parliament is organized by rigorous geographical principles rather than the political process of the state legislature?

Like the geographical principles discussed above, the political principle of maintaining the boundaries of political subdivision (not to divide the boundaries of counties, cities or towns when building Congressional boundaries) and the "community of benefits" In some countries to distinguish (trying to minimize the divisional neighboring boundary) we think that maintaining the core of the previous parliament district and preventing or at least reducing the impact of division attempts.

Redistribution is the process of building a new boundary between Congress and the Legislature. 18 US representatives in Illinois state and 177 state legislators are chosen from the political department known as this region. Senators in the United States are not elected by region but are elected by state. After completing the US census, regional lines are redrawn every ten years. The Federal Government stipulates that the area must be about the same population and not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity.

Member countries are being asked to subdivide them through the Independent Committee, not by party system. Congress is now fascinated by the parliament area in 37 states. Two political parties in Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana and Washington are mixed in red and blue, but the independent committee is used in six states. (Currently there are only one Congressional district in the seven provinces, so it will not be affected by legislation unless the population grows enough to secure multiple regions.)

"Fair representative law" will be "the most comprehensive way to change Parliamentary elections in American history".