How Leaders Can Gain Legitimate Authority

That's a good question. Please bring to us with Malcolm Gladwell what we need to know or already know about his interesting book "David and Goliath: Loser, Inappropriate, and Art of Fighting Giants" I will. Opinions - but we often neglect

This view is included in the principle of legality and it helps to answer the questions above. Gladwell said:

"When the authorities wish others of us to show up more than anything first - what is their performance?"

People who are required to follow authority must feel they have voice.

Permissions must be predictable. There should be a reasonable expectation that the rules of tomorrow will be about the same as today's rules.

The key to understanding this principle is to know that the lenses used to measure legality are contaminated when looking down on employees.

You can not fully understand how they are looking at the world and understanding your leadership. Of course, it used to be a modest employee in the past, even even just a few months ago. But when you go through magical management, you can no longer see what the employee sees.

This is their perception of the reality of being able to hear, seeing your predictable behavior, and admitting the fairness of others you treat to give you legal authority.

What matters is not what you said but what you do. You must know that your behavior mimics your true intention

You know that the principle of legality is correct. Just look at your boss and look back at the above 1, 2 and 3.

If the leader has no legal authority based on the three points listed, where do they come from?

Why are other types of authorities illegal? How does the workplace look under the guidance of a leader with illegal authority?

What kind of lens do you use to measure the validity of your leadership? Is it effective or is it time to try a new one?

Moral leaders are interested in power. In fact, this is the only power they see. Any authority can be legal only if it can achieve that goal. Power should not be, or should not be, a means of acquiring status or improving oneself. Or, in the worst case, prove that you are stronger or better than others. This is a means to achieve a positive goal designed to benefit not only the leader but also many people. Therefore, ethical leaders will encourage and instruct others to lead and share power at the right time, assuming that this sharing accelerates the development of new leaders and enhances the chances of success. Power is a positive force in their philosophy to achieve a healthier community goal and a better quality of life than providing more force, self-expansion, or self-interest.

There are many sources of power, but in a broad sense, there is a difference in power and influence. Power is a legitimate power and belongs to a leader within the formal organization. Power includes legal rights that make decisions that are backed up by sanctions. "The definition of authority is basically a person who has authority to make binding decisions" (Bolman and Deal, 1991: 193). Principals and principals usually have great authority in the formal leadership position.