How does review of systems differ from history of present illness?

You can not access the full text of this article The first page of this article PDF will be displayed at the top.

History is different from other kinds of history. For example, looking back on the current medical history, focusing on the history of the most pressing problems that this person has recently, and looking back on past psychosis, the psychiatric symptoms of the person and their lifetime are reviewed It will be. Instead, the development history focuses on what helps shape people, ie his / her main modes of operation. As discussed in Chapter 1, people are shaped by what they bring to the world - their grace - and their interaction with the environment. When we think of psychodynamics, sometimes we consider only the influence of environmental influences, especially individuals and other people. This is a mistake. According to an old joke, psychoanalysts do not consider the role of genetics in development until they give birth to a second child.

If you stop and listen, you may not be able to go beyond history. What do you think about history? Chief complaint, current medical history, past medical history, family history, social history, systematic review - organ history. This is our common language, standardized, logical, clean, orderly, there is no room for confusion. The history is stolen, deleted and edited. History is what you hear from the story of a nasty sickness you will cough a patient. Your job is to select some words with subjective results, probably a brief phrase, in the subjective findings and quote the quotes in the patient's own words. Subjectivity belongs to the patient. Subjectivity is suspicious, suspicious, plausible. My goal is me, my language, my health checkup and test results, my diagnosis, my treatment plan. Subjectively, there is no space.