How does Rainsford's attitude toward hunting compare with that of General Zaroff?

At the beginning of the story, Rainsford is an avid hunter, feeling that men are better than animals, his prey has no emotions, and general hunting is just a game. He believes the world will split between hunters and hunters. But when you learn that Zarov intends to use him as a prey, this view changes. Accepting that Rainsford must participate in Zaroff's "game", Rainsford became like Zaroff. After he killed Zarov 's dog, and when he killed Ivan, he became a murderer. At the end of the story, Rainsford killed Zaroff, and we did not know if he came like Zaroff.

Zarov has a similar view on his prey. Because animals can not use logic, big prey is boring for Zaroff, so they do not offer any challenge. As a result, Zarov called sailors "Earth's scum" and made them as healthy as possible. Zarov wants his prey to challenge him as much as possible. Zarov saw the world split into a strong and a weak. His prey, seafarers trapped inside the ship of his island are not entitled because they are weak. They have no rights or emotions. When I realized that Zaroff was doing a real challenge at Rainsford, he was very excited because he was famous for hunting. After all, Rainsford proved more embarrassing than Zaroff, Zaroff paid the final price - his death

General Rainsford and General Zarov are talented and talented hunters with short stories "The Most Dangerous Game". Initially, both characters seem to have the same hunting philosophy. At the beginning of the story, Rainsford told Whitney, "This world is made up of two classes - a hunter and a hunter -" (Connell, 1). General Zarov took the same approach to hunting, but took a more enthusiastic and more ruthless approach. General Zerofu and General Rainsford are wealthy people who can move to rare places and catch big animals. Both characters like literature about hunting. When the two first met, Zarov said to Rainsford he read his book on hunting snow leopards in Tibet and then detailed in his abundant hunting literature library.

Despite their many similarities, generals Zeroff and Rennesford have very different views on civilization and ethics. Rainsford noticed that it is very troublesome and terrible thing that general Zaroff murders a man not armed on his island, but Zaroff dismissed Rainsford's concern by calling him rustic. Zarov thought he was a modern civilization, and Rennesford thought he was a murderer. Zarov is also angry with hunting and can not fulfill his desire to be challenged in his own field. In contrast, Rainsford likes to hunt but has the ability to limit his desire.

Rainsford and Zaroff have three situations, male and male. Rainsford and Zaroff are discussing whether to hunt or kill humans; Rainsford set up some traps that hurt Zaroff and his crew; Rainsford killed Zoroff at the end of the story . Zarov has three situations with other "tourists" on the island - male and male - are in conflict. Zarov said he got a "tourist", where the rock crushed the ship and the people on the ship were sent to the island; Zarov told Renesford that he was hunting To treat "tourists" so that they are very competitive; Zarov also told Rainsford that if "tourists" do not want to hunt they may be tortured and killed by Ivan. There are three situations in the conflict between Rainsford and nature - people and nature. Rainsford and himself - people and myself - There are two situations of conflict.