How can people oppose unjust laws?

This idea is called "civil disobedience". It was named by Henry David Thoreau in the 1840's, but the basic concept has a long and distinct history that dates back centuries; in some of the earlier documents, similar laws "Was discussed. Your opinion

In the case of civil disobedience, those who believe that the law is unfair, publicly and nonviolently violating the law. Normally, this is done by a group of people working together, but it can be done by just one person. Then they accepted the punishment for doing so, but tried to draw public attention unfairly to punishment in order to compromise the law of fraud.

For example, Mahatma Gandhi is known for using South African Indians discrimination law and citizen's disobedience for the British enacted law against India. In the 1960 's, Martin Luther King (celebrating his national holiday yesterday!) Engaged in civil disobedience against the American apartheid law.

By definition, nonviolence. Disobedience of citizens does not mean incitement to riots or revolution. It means peace and openness to challenge the law that you think is unfair

This does not punish your punishment. Most governments in the world do not accept any form of "violating citizen exceptions" to protect people from penalties in violation of laws that are considered inequitable. You still have to abide by all the laws, and if you do not obey you will be punished accordingly. Some of the reasons the citizen's disobedience is so difficult and courageous include often spending in jail because it punishes the law you have destroyed.

King argues that there are two kinds of laws: defense against violations by justice and injustice, and non-violent protest action. Fair law and moral law are in harmony, enhancing humanity, and not against the law of God. The unfair law is against the law of God and is made by the majority to control the minority without saying anything. Clearly, the law of separation is a kind of corruption. Mr. Kim argues against the unfair law in the context of "willingness to accept openness, kindness, and punishment", but the public's consciousness of achieving justice shows the highest respect for the law be able to. Principle of justice

In the case of civil disobedience, those who believe that the law is unfair, publicly and nonviolently violating the law. Normally, this is done by a group of people working together, but it can be done by just one person. Then they accepted the punishment for doing so, but tried to attract the public's attention to the wrongdoing of punishment in order to compromise the law of illegality. For example, Mahatma Gandhi is known for using South African Indians discrimination law and citizen's disobedience for the British enacted law against India. In the 1960 's, Martin Luther King (celebrating his national holiday yesterday!) Engaged in civil disobedience against the American apartheid law.

Civil disobedience is refusing to comply with the law (which may be tax) without violence. The law can be unfair or unfair. This is nonviolence which makes the death zero. Some may say that civil disobedience leads to violence, but the civil rebellion is different from civil disobedience. This is a completely legal protest, not included in violence. The democratic government will tolerate civil disobedience. The first law states that in the United States you can say what you want to say. In the 1960s, John and Mary Vestinker wore a black armband to protest the Vietnam War. They were paused until they could not wear them. Parents filed lawsuits and they were sent to the Supreme Court in 1969. The Supreme Court judge agreed with his parents at the decision of 7-2. This example shows that the greatest democracy has adapted to civil disobedience.