A way to change personal problems into public issues by simple aggregation. For example, if a person is out of work, this is a personal matter, but if 20% of the population are unemployed, you will encounter public problems. Likewise, when a person is alcoholic, this is a personal matter, but when 25% of the population is drunk, you have a public problem. When it becomes a structural characteristic of society, personal problems become public problems. Obviously, the actual cause of this public issue is not a simple set but a specific social mechanism.
Anyway, I think that what you truly mean is how sociologists relate personal problems to public issues for meaningful social investigation.
American sociologist C. Wright Mills - Wikipedia (la enciclopedia libre) wrote one of the most influential books on this issue - Sociological Imagination - Wikipedia. One of the main issues of this book is that sociological imagination is a sort of introspection practice, which means that social researchers understand social life by explaining three aspects help. Various subjectivity spreading in society. In Mill 's discourse, sociological imagination allows its owner to understand the greater historical scene from the meaning of inner life and personal external history.
There is a big difference in the imagination of sociology. That is the difference you are in. It is a personal matter, it is the distance between the actual situation of the individual and the desire for it, so that the individual plays a role in a series of direct social relations. In distinguishing other aspects of your public issue, they transcend the scope of personal experience. It is related to the organization of the social structure of society as a whole at a specific historical moment. The ability to clarify the difference between the two is to have sociological imagination
Mills believes that the troubles that we encounter will occur when the value cherished by the community is threatened, and this is due to the structural contradiction of social change. For example, those affected by war such as war refugees are troubles in their private life, and the value they care (step count, safety, health etc) is threatened. War is a product of structural contradiction, such as a democratic election system aimed at the rhythm of life, elections, management of national leaders who are easy to fight.
I recommend you read this book. In particular, regarding Chapter 1 (appointment) and appendix (intellectual craftsmanship)
In this subject we explain that increasing social problems leads to personal problems. Problems that you, friends, family, or people you read may be a problem. Explain the situation, boldly present personal problems and larger social problems, and explain the relationship from causality. Limit response to one double space page
Question: In this subject, please explain how bigger social problems lead to personal problems. I can do it
A way to change personal problems into public issues by simple aggregation. For example, if a person is out of work, this is a personal matter, but if 20% of the population are unemployed, you will encounter public problems. Likewise, when a person is alcoholic, this is a personal matter, but when 25% of the population is drunk, you have a public problem. When it becomes a structural characteristic of society, personal problems become public problems. Obviously, the actual cause of this public issue is not a simple set but a specific social mechanism.
The boundary between personal problems and public issues is subjective and depends on how the group is defined. However, when a sufficiently large social sector is affected by the problem, it becomes a social problem. Returning to unemployment, unemployment is not a social problem but a personal matter, but dismissal of 13 million people can cause various social problems. The problem of value is a social problem in which people unify in the same way. These kinds of questions often create broad consensus and do not cause resistance of the general public. An example of a value problem is a condition that has been condemned to a sufficient degree by child abuse and society, and some social scientists say that it is as general as for explanatory purposes.