How bad is US gun violence? These charts show the scale of the problem

Gun violence in the United States is not only bad, but also unique in that it counts the number of lives affected by it and that such violence is rare in wealthy countries. The graph below shows the severity of the problem

Other wealthier countries do not have as many guns as America. They also do not have as many gun deaths as the United States.

The comparison can help us understand the scale. Since the first collection of these data in 1968 there were 1,516,863 gun-related deaths in the US territory. Since the establishment of the United States, 1,396,733 people died. This number includes the American Revolutionary War, the Mexican War, the Civil War (Alliance and Alliance, Estimated), Spain - American War, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf War, Afghanistan included. War, Iraq War, and other disputes including Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Somalia, Haiti

Source: Disease Control and Prevention Center, 1994 (firearm death data), Congressional investigation service, 2010 (collision death). Number of updates of Polififact in 2015

When people think about gun violence they may kill 59 people in Las Vegas on Sunday considering a massive mass bombardment case. However, of the cases of violence caused by about 33,000 guns a year, only 500 cases (5%) were hit by massive shooting. Two-thirds of deaths due to gun violence are caused by suicide

Source: Disease Control and Prevention Center, 2012 - 14, FBI, 2014, Mother Jones, 2014, Global Terrorism Database, 2016

There seems to be a consensus that gun violence exists in the United States, but I think I have seen charts and graphs showing that the crime of guns and guns is increasing. Although the government has not actually studied the issue of gun violence in fact for more than 15 years. Things began to blur when we tried to pull back some layers and find the cause of gun violence problems. We have "good people with guns and bad guys with guns". From a statistical point of view, the results are completely irrelevant. In many cases "good guys" did not really prevent mass killings.

There is a problem with a good person with a gun. You have a nice fellow with a gun in Las Vegas. A good man with a gun blocked a bad guy with a gun. After 60 people died, they stopped him. The bad guys with guns can always do enough damage if they are very tilted before the good people reach out. The good point of the gun problem was always a manufacturer of the gun industry. They like it. In other words, they love America. They are considering people who sell guns - they have a perfect formula. They are selling illnesses and they are said to be selling treatment. Do you understand? They sell weapons of mass bombardment and murder, robbery, domestic violence, and "If they have guns everything will be wonderful! You will be able to protect themselves You can say that.

I think the time has come for the Democratic Party to reconsider our position on guns. Gun violence in the United States is a matter of public health. Gun violence in the United States is a matter of social justice. Gun violence in the United States is an economic problem. Gun violence in the United States affected our freedom consciousness and we reduced the ability to pursue our happiness. Democrats need to start talking about all these problems. The problem of gun violence in the United States is not solved only by control and control. There seems to be a consensus that gun violence exists in the United States, but I think I have seen charts and graphs showing that the crime of guns and guns is increasing. Although the government has not actually studied the issue of gun violence in fact for more than 15 years. Things began to blur when we tried to pull back some layers and find the cause of gun violence problems. We have "good people with guns and bad guys with guns". From a statistical point of view, the results are not perfectly relevant.