How are the attitudes in "sinners in the hands of an angry god " and "the minister's black veil " different?

Whether an evil person has a visible means of death is condemned and it is foolish to feel safe.

Guilt is usually hidden behind the veil. I am wearing a mask. The missionary chose to ignore them every day, wearing a black veil to remind people of the crime committed.

The missionary showed a flock of sheep as everyone was connected (see John Donne, Meditation XVII). And everyone shared sin and loss as a community. And no matter how hard you try to avoid committing the guilty of being a community, everyone's life is to some extent a part of others. Losing one is a loss of the entire community; after all, however, the lives and deaths of all people belong to everyone in human society.

Reconciliation and hope: Everyone is bound by sin, everyone has to choose to face their sin or ignore it.

Missionaries attempted to teach by wearing a black veil throughout their lives. It is a manifestation of the wall of sin that separates us

When the story began, the missionary's first sermon on "secret sin" was over. The veil worn by missionaries is what they have to see every day, not one or two times a week.

Moral preaching: The veil of the preacher will tell you whether we are confronted or not. His flock shows this

The difference after reading Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Black Veil" and Jonathan Edwards "The Sinner in the Angry God's Hand" is punishment, curse, and who is the sinner. I'm confident. The Edwards God's account scared the congregation through extensive talk about his God and Mr. Hooper's service barely mentioned God, and the fear of his parish is towards the black veil I pulled them. Mr. Hooper will be a more efficient missionary, better than Edwards. Because he does not use hell as the ultimate curse of human sin. Instead, he uses a black veil to punish your sins and confess.

The sermon of Jonathan Edward's "sinners in the hands of angry gods" really shows some strong religious beliefs. The religious part of his sermons was the only way he preached about Hawthorne 's short story "Minister' s Black Veil." The difference is that they are similar. There are many contrasts between Edwards 'sermon and Hawthorn' s "Hawthorn" story, and he is not as easy as he wants to say. He drew an image on the surface using the Minister and his blackveil, but the whole story is as follows. The minister concealed his "sin" through a black veil. This is slightly different from Edwards pointing directly to the sermon.