How applicable do you think Sun Tzu´s strategic theory on war is in contemporary warfare?

As classics, music, literature, or problems suggest, there is a legitimate reason for the existence of specialized fields such as war. They try to convey some influence that is not influenced by time

Sun Tzu survived after the test of the war of 2500, universally providing the concept and principle of applicable war, and survived: understanding all the possibilities of good leadership, adequate logic, enemies, morale and Maintain your own power and destroy enemy's power - there is an eternal principle. They apply equally to the era of bows, guns, and nuclear weapons. (Clearly, by replacing several clauses with modern terms - replacing tanks with tanks, gongs and drums tactical radios, flags and flags, as well as "grab the countryside." In general, the same thing But it sounds more like a PC.)

Nonetheless, you think that modern wars are mainly asymmetric conflicts (rebellion / rebellion): I think internal conflict between government forces and non-state battle parties. Since 1945, 85% to 90% of armed conflicts were of this type. These principles also apply to asymmetric conflicts - but it is necessary to remember that this is a much more complex social phenomenon than the international war. It can only be resolved by military means in very rare situations and situations - even in this case the result will be long term and very suspicious.

Trustworthy critical internal challenges to the power of the government, such as political power, economics, administration, legislation, justice, law enforcement agencies, military elements, often require very complicated responses - Whole "or" the whole country. " The classic principles of war (and current rules from classics) apply only to military elements - but must be applied to judge the situation and carefully consider it.

The problem is that the partner (non-state battle party) is also wise, thinking and learning entity. He also knows (or learns) the principles of warfare and often applies them with skills higher than the power of the government.

More specifically, Sun Tzu's "War Art", war planning and successful war may be applied in this modern era, but it is legal to discuss some principles in grandson's era is. I will examine and explain how it relates to today's business world. I think Jolibee will buy Mang Inasal. Consider Smart to acquire a company known as Red Mobile. Please think that Disney purchases Pixar's animation. To make Steve Jobs sell NeXT computer to Apple, you need some money and 5 million shares of Apple stock. All of these are strategic initiatives to achieve the ultimate goal. Grandchild articles mean that you get control over market share - simply when you apply to business terms - you gain great benefits. In order to succeed, companies must dominate the market share of the industry

This article shows that classical strategic theory also applies to modern warfare. Due to the short length of this article, only two classical theorists certify that Krasevitz and its grandchildren are still relevant to modern warfare. These two theorists are considered to be the two most prominent of all classical strategic theorists. In order to evaluate what is classified as a modern war, this will be considered in the context of the war of the 21st century, focusing on the actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As Clausewitz and his grandchild wrote the theory of war, the way war broke out changed drastically. Since 1648, war has been considered the most important change. War was regarded as the first generation, and between 1648 and 1860 war was regarded as being operated by nation-state. The second generation was considered to be a typical representative of the First World War. There the technology improved the production of weapons and the effectiveness of weapons, and the war went through consumption through fire power and war. The second generation war was represented by the war during World War II. There, mobile wars were used to create nonlinear battlefields to attack linear defenses.