Going to school at home is a new option for children's education. As with other major movements, this educational approach has been supported and promoted, and has been questioned and discussed at the same time. Before the public school system emerged, home school was once a common sense of society. However, parents who participate in family education feel very strong about the good results that they bring to their lives and successes. It reborn again and became popular, but some people questioned the possible adverse effects of this option.
The criticism of family education is very big. There are several different aspects, and why it may be harmful to development.
As an ambitious teacher, let's look at the vocational training required for certified teachers. Parents of family education are not necessarily certified, and there is no educational experience to train classroom teachers. The idea that home schooling is another business department is also criticized. Rob Reich, a famous professor at Stanford University, believes home schooling is another part of the growing business community (Reich, 2002, p. 58). In home education, you can create specialized courses by selecting teaching materials specific to your child's strengths. This is not a growing process to build children's weakness and strength, but makes education like a business. It is also worth noting that most of the people receiving family education are white middle-class families who can buy middle-income families (Lubienski, 2000, p. 209). Therefore, home education is not an option for anyone who may be interested in this possibility.
However, supporters have identified a number of positive aspects about the impact of home schooling. One such example is that in standardized tests, children in home education are usually 15 to 30 more than public high schools (Ray, 2002, p. 51). Furthermore, according to the survey, students attending school at home are working socially well. Home schooling organization was created so that these children can communicate with each other to cope with fear
One of the biggest myths of our failure is that we do not know that socialization at home school does not exist or that household educators are very strange or how to interact with people It is an idea. The truth of the problem is that there are advantages and disadvantages in the social experience of home educators as well as public schools have strengths and weaknesses. The experience of all children is different, but the most fair way to express socialization in the home education environment is that it is different. My parents decide to go to school because they do not want their children's values to be defined by their colleagues and they do not want children to face social stupidities or bullying. In private schools and public schools there is the possibility that the pressure to "adapt" or acquire social status among classmates can be very high.
For parents considering taking a child home, the advantages and disadvantages are as follows. This list comes from the day-to-day experience of many families in the U.S. who used home schools instead of public school systems. We start with a professional. You can teach what you want when you want it. The greatest advantage of home schooling may be the choice of a child's course. You can choose what time your child is learning, the time to study and the time to study. No one of your children knows you better. Now, people care more about your child's progress than you. If you want to spend more time studying mathematics, you can do this. If American history is particularly important, you can put it in your child's class. Children can also spend more time researching areas of interest such as art and science.