Hobbes as a Social Covenant Theorist

Thomas Hobbs proved that Hobbes, a social contractor theorist of all sections of Leviathan, was a "social contract" theorist, but contradictory. He clarified the basic concept of social contract theory by creating rulers or common wealth by establishing rules on property and contracts through human interpretation from the natural state. In order to fully understand Hobbes' social contract theory he must first be familiar with the basic premise of his "natural state". In this state, each person is in a state of perpetual war for several given reasons.

Hobbes' social theory is often mistakenly called "social contract theory", and the mistake is "contract". Hobbes' social theory is more properly called "social contract theory". The difference between "Contract" and "Contract" is that contracts may be destroyed at any time when a party violates a contract or when contract terms are satisfied at any time, and the contract may be included in the result of one or the other party It does not depend on it. Whatever you do, it will last indefinitely. The western traditional view of "contracts" is like the concept of "marriage". "Death makes us separate." Divorce is almost impossible to invalidate the contract between men and women. Hobbes' theory will go one step further, no matter what the citizens of the country or the sovereign nationals do, social contracts will continue to exist no matter what the party does. In the case of obtaining power by theft, extortion, murder etc.

Locke, Hobbsrock and Hobbes are both social contractor theorists and two natural law theorists, but the similarities are over. All other natural law theorists believe that humans are essentially social animals. Hobbes has other assumptions, so his conclusion is quite different from that of other natural law theorists. If there is no government, what kind of life and relationship are there? Thomas Hobbs was the first person who tried to use intellectuals to explain this situation ... Thomas Hobbs: What is the difference in obligation between foro interno and foro externo? When is such obligation? Thomas Hobbes believes that there are certain natural laws in the absence of an organized government. These laws are very strict and put people at risk of a very dangerous life. The government is the answer to this dangerous situation, but here the question of duty is questioned. is