Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau Comparison Grid

The state of nature is the state of war. There is no moral existence. Everyone is always afraid. Because of this fear no one is truly free, but even the "weakest" people can kill the "strongest" people.

Humans are completely free to do what they want in their natural state. The natural state is not necessarily good or bad. This is very confusing. Therefore, men abandon the benefits of civilized society.

People in the state of nature are free and equal. In the state of nature, men are "noble barbarians". Civilization is one that defiles him

The representative will ensure that the government will respond to the people. Representative is protection against oppression

Expression is not enough. Citizens can not delegate civic duties. They have to actively participate. Rousseau supports more direct democracy and formulates general intentions

This paper summarizes social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also advocates differences between these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally raises a critical understanding of social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, serious Problem, Renaissance

Hobbies, rock and Rousseau. The contractual conditions assumed by these theories are not identical, they arise from the details of the original position assumed by a particular social contractor theorist. T. HoBBEs, LEVIATHAN, J. LOCKE, Civil Administration, J. See RoUSSEAu, Social Contract. Instead, make sure everyone is equal - a truly fair arrangement. 49 This equality does not exist in reality. This is because real social contracts are concluded by parties who are most concerned about cultivating their own interests. Strong people can influence others and be able to secure contracts. Therefore it is necessary to think experiments and to imagine situations where Rawis has to agree on justice standards to apply to all future arrangements rather than to explain our specific interests I ask you.

For rock and Rousseau, and former British Thomas Hobbes of Rock, the state reflects the essence of the person who produced it. Mr. Hobbes said people 's "natural conditions" are self - seeking and competing. As the sole means of self-defense, he can escape the brutal cycle of mutual destruction, otherwise this is the result of his contact with others. For Locke, the state of human beings is not so strict, but the country once again made the need for protection, in this case an inherent right. Mr. Rock said the state is a social contract and individuals agree not to infringe on each other's "natural rights" against life, freedom and property in exchange for their "free protection realm".