Both Socrates and Machiavelli are eager to achieve the same goal of specific political goals. Prince Machiavelli talked about his desire to end the political conflict through the order system and Plato's explanation on Socrates suggested that his time the government wishes to be replaced by a more just system I saw. These two historical figures are very relevant to how you realize the concept of power and the concept of power, but that is biased with regard to the means they want to achieve their personal goals.
For centuries, many philosophers have emerged, and that theory has been expanding every era. At the turn of the 17th century, I saw Thomas Hobbes' s theory of human nature as an influential philosopher. In the absence of political power or authority, the state of nature explains the situation (highbeam.com). Hobbes' theory thinks human nature is of course competitive and violent. However, the 18th century philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau had a contrasting theory that natural persons are those who live in harmony with nature (science.jrank.org). Humanity theory continues, until the 19th century psychologists began to study the meaning of "ordinary behavior" and the meaning of ordinary behavior in society. Many theories have been published, some are used today, others are regarded as immoral. One of them, in particular, was Rosenken in 1973.
Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were philosophers of the 17th and 18th centuries and had a similar but distinct theory about the nature of humans. The theory of Hobbes is based on the assumption that human nature is competitive and violent and the theory concerning the state of Rousseau's "natural person" is a life harmonized with nature, what is seen in the life of Europe It is better than. Hobbes was criticized for his excessively ironic cynicalism and Rousseau was criticized for his simple nature of humanity. In this article, although both theories are flawed, Rousseau's "natural person" is a very idealized concept, indicating that Hobbes 'ability to destroy His argument is higher than Hobbes' natural person. Therefore, Hobbes has a more rational theory of humanity.
Thomas Hobbs proposed the first systematic discourse of social contract theory. According to Mr. Hobbes, our humanity is preventing us from arranging our neighbors naturally. Hobbes explains this by explaining the natural state before politics of people's constant war. To transcend this natural state, we recognize the need for peace, the need to abandon hostile rights, and the need to maintain consensus. Therefore, we establish social contracts with each other and establish a government with absolute power over us in order to ensure that we follow our agreements. For Hobbes, morality involves the acquisition of virtue. Virtue tends to habitually allow us to make social contract terms that require us.