HIV/AIDS in India:An epidemic

It may be seen as a result of economists' excessive labor force, which eventually resulted in a trend. The population of India is estimated at 35 billion people, more than 37% of their population live below the poverty line and suffer serious poverty. (Economic Observation) Overproduction capacity is very low in India's labor price and outsourcing is rampant. The combination of low labor price and caste system elimination and high reliance on agriculture has exacerbated poverty and thus leads to the largest population at the border of HIV / AIDS infected countries - 2.3 million.

It is estimated that the number of people living with HIV in India increased dramatically from thousands of people in the early 1990s to about 1 million children in 2003 and HIV / AIDS patients. AIDS epidemics in India, with more than 1 billion people, will have a major impact on the overall spread of HIV in Asia, the Pacific and around the world. The epidemic in India is composed of many epidemics, and in some places they occur in the same state. In some states, the main route of HIV infection, the epidemic varies from mainly HIV-infected countries to injections of drug use.

In the past, the prevalence of infectious diseases such as HIV / AIDS and infectious diseases has caused an exactly similar pattern of responses. The chronological pattern of HIV / AIDS is divided into three phases: (1) Negation - A new epidemic exists in the country, reflecting the lack of preventive or therapeutic measures or restrictions on the border. - There is an epidemic in that country (recognizing that a country has its infectious disease occurring and taking steps to confirm the epidemic of the infectious disease); 3) mobilization - to prevent further epidemics Spread nationally actively participate in social and governmental level. Four

Refusing US government and South African government's policy on HIV / AIDS greatly increased the influence of epidemics to their respective countries. The president during the epidemic of HIV / AIDS did not know the true destructive power of the disease, but was blinded by wrong prejudice. In the United States, "President Reagan hosted a new epidemic of five years before announcing the term" AIDS "for the first time" (Drucker, 2012). Not only did President Reagan fail to promote AIDS treatment, it could not completely solve the problem. This rejection to focus on expanding HIV / AIDS faster and easier. In a study quantifying the influence of government ignorance during epidemics, "a conservative conservative group of preventable HIV infections was 4394 (15% for needle change) to 9666 (33% incidence ) Drucker 2012). 2009). 2009)