History in Film

History of introduction of movies with history [1]. When depicting historical figures, especially women's persons (due to lack of social existence or lack of social recognition), the film is responsible for accurately representing the historical person whose reputation is being threatened . As a past and present medium, the movie has incredible ability to take historical ownership; the director has mastered the key to making history a reality.

As I said, there are advantages and disadvantages in sentence history and movie history, respectively. But it is important that the written history and the history of the movies are experienced in different ways. "Rosenstone R, 1988, p. 1173) stated Rosenstone," The most serious problem the historian has had on the screen in the past is derived from the nature and requirements of the visual media itself. " In addition, Rosenstone considers "historical movies should be based on their own representative rules, not based on the way it compares with written history" (Rosenstone R, 1995, p. 3). Critics point out that this film lacks the necessary historical information and historical details. Historians basically mention the lack of footnotes. However, these historian critics are trying to judge these historical films on inappropriate standards. The way audiences watch movies is an unrealistic analysis

Researchers say that there is no movie history, only movie history. But I think movie history will be more appropriately considered a group of cinematic history, as research involving film history involves asking a series of questions and looking for evidence to answer them during the discussion I will. Therefore, the main purpose of my research is to find the answer to the question "How is a film photo displayed?" What to do? What is the way it was developed? Situation of the film industry - production, distribution, exhibition - how will it affect people? How does time affect the change of the film industry?