History and the challenge of gender history

In this article, we will provide a critical assessment of the discussions inside and outside the gender history. A fruitful result in this field is definitely wonderful. The history of women is now the history of gender, expanding historical research and enriching it. This is obvious. But success also brings challenges. Despite the early 'big propaganda', the history of women never overturned this theme by creating new generic explanations and more ambitious new epistemology. In contrast, gender historians face the same theoretical problem as other historians. The nature and chronological change and / or continuity of the chronology remains unknown. In addition, gender historians have their own arguments about the historical construction of gender identity. Eternal historical "women" have been abandoned, but the way and degree of learning, communication and change of social roles is not clear. Of course, assuming normative behavioral literature constitutes a single control "discourse", it is too simple to impose a sex role in passive people. The role of people and language is more complex than this. Indeed, unless a specific case is presented for its relevance, a single "discourse" should be avoided. Likewise, discussions between historians rely too much on hypothetical dichotomies (such as discrepancies between "public" and "me"), which is now more complicated and diversified. Finally, there is no need for a genderic history to assert dramatic changes to the new feminist epistemology, or to recognize the impact of skeptical postmodernists on the dying men 's rationality. This means seeking a warm, feminine intuition rather than a cold, masculine logic. . The challenge is comprehensive. As a path to knowledge, the overall history must include a history of diverse and critical gender.

Gender History is a subfield of historical and gender studies to investigate the past from a gender perspective. It is a product of women 's history in many ways. Sexual life is relatively short, but the history of sex (and the history of women in its pioneers) has had a considerable influence on general research in history. Since the 1960's, when the first small field was first accepted, it has undergone many different stages with their own challenges and results, respectively. Several changes in historical research, such as increasing the number of books by famous women, or simply putting more women into historical occupation are very obvious, but the other influences are more subtle .

In this article, we will provide a critical assessment of the discussions inside and outside the gender history. A fruitful result in this field is definitely wonderful. The history of women is now the history of gender, expanding historical research and enriching it. This is obvious. But success also brings challenges. Despite the early 'big propaganda', the history of women never overturned this theme by creating new generic explanations and more ambitious new epistemology. In contrast, gender historians face the same theoretical problem as other historians. The nature and chronological change and / or continuity of the chronology remains unknown. In addition, gender historians have their own arguments about the historical construction of gender identity. Eternal historical "women" have been abandoned, but the way and degree of learning, communication and change of social roles is not clear. The challenge is comprehensive