Historical Review of Cancer Risks in Medical Radiation Workers

In epidemiological studies targeting medical radiology workers, people employed before 1950 have leukemia and the risk of skin and female breast cancer is too high, but there is little consistent evidence of cancer risk was. Occupational radiation dose-related dose response, recent risk assessment, and lifelong cancer risk data are limited to radiologists and radiologists, and there is a shortage of doctors and technicians who implement or support fluoroscopic guidance procedures I will. Effective doses to physicians for each intervention are estimated to fluctuate by more than one order of magnitude, based on a significant reduction in data from 80 small studies for cardiologists and other experts. To assess the lifetime cancer risk of radiologists and radiologists in existing cohorts and to limit the time trend of the average annual occupational radiation exposure and the dose received by medical radiologists to initiate long-term implementation or support intervention It is urgently necessary to expand the information base. Doctors and technicians in the program follow up on terminology on the risk of cancer and other radiation related diseases. These studies are designed to optimize standardized protocols for radiotherapy, to determine the relevance of current radiological protection measures, to provide guidance on the need for cancer screening, and to assess cancer risk associated with chronic radiation exposure Offer valuable insight of.

Key words: radiologist, interventional radiologist, x-ray technician, interventional cardiologist, tumor, review

There is a danger that the patient is exposed to medical imaging radiation. Because ionizing radiation can damage DNA, exposure can increase the risk of cancer in your lifetime. Individual tests may not be so dangerous, but millions of tests are done each year, and radiation exposure of medical images is an important public health issue 10. It is estimated that about 29,000 future cancers may be involved in the CT scan performed in the United States in 2007. 11 Smith-Bindman et al.

In epidemiological studies targeting medical radiology workers, people employed before 1950 have leukemia and the risk of skin and female breast cancer is too high, but there is little consistent evidence of cancer risk was. Occupational radiation dose-related dose response, recent risk assessment, and lifelong cancer risk data are limited to radiologists and radiologists, and there is a shortage of doctors and technicians who implement or support fluoroscopic guidance procedures I will. Based on the minority of research data from 80 major cardiologists and the number of studies by other experts, it is estimated that the effective dose of each intervention physician differs by more than one order of magnitude.

As long as you are exposed to high doses of radiation during adolescent cancer treatment, the risk of cancer due to medical radiation seems to be small. It usually takes many years before the effects of radiation exposure appear, and we can not be sure because the increase in high dose imaging only occurred after 1980. Discuss high dose diagnostic imaging with the clinician. If you need CT or nuclear scan to treat or diagnose illness, the benefit is usually greater than risky. Still, if your clinician is already ordering a CT, you can reasonably ask about how the result distinguishes your condition; for example it will invite you invasive techniques Will you be saved?