Historical Interpretation of Economic-Social Change

Economics - Historical Interpretation of Social Change From the historical interpretation of economic social change, the problem is that it is difficult for historians to comment without personal political bias, and that is a matter of discussing living standards It is the reason why you have to look side by side. "Pessimists" believe that the situation of the working class has deteriorated, while "optimist" believes that the situation was improved by industrialization.

Historical materialism is a methodological method of social, economic and historical research first described by Karl Marx. His fundamental proposition on historical materialism can be summarized as follows. It is not a human consciousness to decide its existence, it is a social being to decide its consciousness. - Karl Marx, "Contribution to Criticism of Political Economy" Introduction Historical materialism pursues the cause of human social development and change so that humans jointly create a lifestyle, Economic basis, political structure, ideology)

Marxism is based on a materialistic interpretation of historical development, a dialectical view of social change, an analysis of class relations in society, and criticism and analysis of capitalist development. In the application. . From mid-nineteenth to late, Marxist intellectual development was initiated by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxist analysis and methodology influenced various political ideologies and social movements in history. Marxism includes economic theory, sociological theory, philosophical method, and a revolutionary view on social change. There is no definite Marxist theory; Marxist theories are many, as Marxist analysis has been applied to a variety of different themes and has been modified in the course of its development.

Historical materialism is a way Marxism explains history. It is an interpretation of the relationship between people and the resulting class struggle. According to Marxist theory, there is a series of historical stages each with its own ruling class. Under feudalism, the ruling class is aristocratic, while capitalist dominates capitalism and socialism has its pioneerism. Since the understanding of historical materialism is very important for the ideology of the Marxist working-class party, its plan and policy must be based on its understanding to "succeed". Without the ability to understand and apply these laws, the party will ignore the problems arising in the struggle of the socialist revolutionary class (McCarthy).