Historical experience and temporality. Ankersmit's 'Sublime Historical Experience'

The historical experience of Ankersmit's Sublime seems to correspond to Ricoeur's time and story (Volume 3, Chicago, 1984-1985, London). Both studies include relationships between time experiences in historical writing and special forms of time. However, there are important differences between the two studies. Riko acknowledges the relationship between time experience and the time nature of the story and emphasizes that it is continuous every time but Ankersmit denies the existence of this relationship and thinks that historical time experience is discontinuous It is. Ankermit's time experience arises from a sublime / traumatic time sense due to heavenly loss. Ankersmit has lost the world of AncienRegime. In the footsteps of Karl Mannheim, Ankersmit considers himself the same as a (romantic) conservative. I believe that he lost his identity in relation to AncienRégime. In this review, I question whether conservatives mentioned by Mannheim have trauma experience suggested by Ankersmit. In early studies, Ankersmit emphasized that historians eliminate time in historical stories. Therefore, Ankersmit believes that his exalted time experience has nothing to do with the special narrative format of time. Contrary to Ankersmit's own opinion, the authors believe there is such a relationship. Ankersmit unintentionally expressed his admiration for small history and Burckhardt and Huizinga's work.

This can stimulate the sense of perception that historians are the only way to tell us what the past really is and that we can experience history as part of us. As far as he drew a picture by Francesco Guardi where he can actually feel the depth of the ancient government, Ankersmit explains the resulting loss of loss using his personal history. It burns out. In a very historical experience, Ankersmit traveled through landscapes full of unknowns and taboos and led his readers to a phenomenal intellectual adventure.

The historical experience of Ankersmit's Sublime seems to correspond to Ricoeur's time and story (Volume 3, Chicago, 1984-1985, London). Both studies include relationships between time experiences in historical writing and special forms of time. However, there are important differences between the two studies. Riko acknowledges the relationship between time experience and the time nature of the story and emphasizes that it is continuous every time but Ankersmit denies the existence of this relationship and thinks that historical time experience is discontinuous It is. Ankermit's time experience arises from a sublime / traumatic time sense due to heavenly loss. Ankersmit has lost the world of AncienRegime. Among the footsteps of Kalmanheim, Anxmet agrees to be the same as a (romantic) conservative believer that he lost his identity in connection with AncienRégime.

The historic Baroque style claimed by Malabar and one aspect that I believe is reliable is the relationship he established between the political sovereignty of the landlord class and the rise of aristocratic culture. For Maravall, the exalted experience captured the fearful historical experience of the 17th century instability and the crisis. The Baroque era was an era of unusual economic crisis and subsequent political anger and confusion in the era of well-known idioms "the world reversed" - the era of confusion and degeneration - unless forgotten. 2 "Baroque people live in this contradiction," as Malaval said, "It will appear in the form of extreme laughter and cry".