His taints and honours waged equal with him?

Philo is a loyal friend and a war partner of Anthony, who got up from all the soldiers respected and gave up everything he had about Empire when he met Cleopatra. He is not sure which category Anthony is suitable for. (5.1) As Anthony played a number of roles, we saw different aspects of the discussion. Anthony can claim to be able to fulfill the needs of his country and his empire warriors and leaders. He commits suicide and is regarded as glorious, so he can be seen to be equal to Caesar.

Discussions on how complex Anthony's brilliant debate is, both have the same evidence. As a glorious person, Anthony was first supported by his faithful soldiers to support his best friend, Enobarbus and Philo in this war, and they believe that this sentence is the best of his two He said he was a reliable fellow and believer. However, the discussion against Anthony comes, in particular, from Cleopatra and Caesar's attendants and servants. But Caesar was fully supportive of Anthony to a certain extent, before Octoberia's "melt the Tiber River", Octavia and his "hand in hand" finally declared this (5.1). So, after all, Enobarbus' support, his loyal support, and the end of the end of time, Caesar, Anthony are having a wonderful past than his obvious fallen soldiers.

I have another question about what makes Glory to Anthony. For example, when Anthony was ready to meet Caesar in the fight, he decided, "He lives / gets honored to die." Anthony and Cleopatra will commit suicide, but the theater is powerless for various reasons. They all believe that the bill will invest them in honor. When dying, Anthony returned to its former identity as a true, noble Roman, becoming "Romans / Romans / brave warriors" (4.16), Cleopatra solved and buried him. Well then, brave, noble things / what we are going to do after fashion in luxury Romans "(4.16) Anthony and Cleopatra refused to compromise their identity, thus ensuring the death of glory