Herbert Spencer concludes from his principle of equal freedom that individuals have the Right to Ignore the State (1851)

Spencer concludes from his law of equal freedom that one can choose to "adopt a voluntary violation" condition and choose to "ignore the state" without infringing the rights of others I am attaching.

As a consequence of the assertion that all institutions must obey the law of equal freedom, we are forced to choose the right for citizens to voluntarily violate. As long as there is freedom to do everything what everyone wishes, he can abandon the relationship with the state - unless they infringe on others' equal freedoms - abandon protection and pay their support I refuse to do. Needless to say, in such an act he will never infringe the freedom of others; his position is passive; he can not become an attacker when passive. Naturally, citizenship includes payment of taxes, depriving of his property from his own intention is an infringement of his rights, forced to continue the political company without violating the moral law It can not be.

After serving as a freelance magazine editor, economist Spencer wrote the first comprehensive defense against individual freedom. It includes a chapter to explore the deepest level of anti - nationalism liberalism. In later versions, this chapter "Ignore national rights" has been omitted. Perhaps because he regretted some of his young extremist side.

The background of natural rights in economic issues should be particularly evident in Herbert Spencer's research 70 his first social statistic announced in 1851 is the clear principle of natural rights - the principle of natural freedom - Inherited. God of Equality - The right to exercise freedom and happiness (but due to its length) for self defense may have been developed by John Rock 71 Many social statistics are those in the familiar situation Pursue economic and political implications of the principle. Spirit of laissez - faireism. However, Spencer also relates this stern position to another naturalism closer to Darwinism, the struggle of life, the evolution of society, and the idea of ​​"survival of the fittest". It is not clear how this two ideas can be harmonized.

As early as the 19th century, Herbert Spencer believed that the government was fundamentally immoral, as the government endangered the basic principles of "equality and freedom". The existence of the government is based on the fact that it is using violence to suppress evil in order to maintain the power being used to fight crime. In our case above, the state violated the law of "equality and freedom". As Spencer wrote in "Social Statistics": "But if a serious breach (" Equality Freedom Act ") against it is wrong, then they are also wrong (...). It is recommended that you infringe on their rights and not allow such infringement. "In the same chapter, Spencer legalized the individual's right to" ignore the state "and appealed. I propose to take more wise action here and refuse to comply with the law. To make matters worse, you go to the police station for hours.

The most extreme reflection of Herbert Spencer's 19th century individualism can be found in Herbert Spencer's encyclopedia (1820-1903). His father and mother 's ancestors were traces of years of British and French non - compliant people, opposition and rebels, and Spencer in his "autobiography". "Ignoring ignoring" of his politics, religion and social authority cherishes the independence tradition for a long time, opposed to what his family cherishes. - A chapter entitled "Lenovo Vision" domestically and abroad handles the vision of Herbert Hoover in domestic and international chapters of Ellis Holly's "Searching for Great War and Contemporary Order". In this chapter, we first took up Herbert Hoover's view on "Lenovo countries". After he saw the influence of World War I and the scandal accompanying the Coolidge administration, "Lenovo State" was Huber's vision for the United States.