Herbert Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism

Herbert Blumer's theory symbolizing the interaction symbolizing interaction is the process of interaction in Herbert Bloomer's thought, the formation of an individual's meaning. Bullmer is a believer in George Mead and is influenced by John Dewey. Dewey insists that humans can best understand their environment (Society for More Creative Speech, 1996). Inspired by Herbert Blumer, he outlines a symbolic interaction, a study of human group living and behavior.

A brief explanation of symbolic interactions often misunderstands its creation to early American sociologist George Herbert Meade. Indeed, another American sociologist, Herbert Blumer, created a phrase "symbolic interaction". In other words, it is a practical theory of Mead that has established a solid foundation for the naming and development of the view after this. Mead's theoretical contribution is included in the heart, self, and society he announced after his death. In this work, Mead made an important contribution to sociology by theorizing the difference between "me" and "me". He believes that today's sociologist believes that "I" is social thought, respiration, and active subjects, "I" is an accumulation of knowledge about how they are perceived by others as themselves I wrote that. (Another earlier American sociologist, Chul 's Horton Cooley called "I" as "Mirror Self" and doing so did an important contribution to the symbolic interaction.

Herbert Blumer, the founder of the term "symbolic interactionism", had a major impact on social theory and methodology. As a respected critic and devotee of George Herbert Mead, Bloomers enthusiastically stated the importance of personal meaning as a behavior entity, a direct empirical observation as a methodology, introduced by it Advantage and centrality of "contextual definition". WI Thomas. Bullmer's thought was also influenced by the famous pragmatist John Dewey. Before discussing Bulmer 's idea, I will outline a brief overview of the main ideas of Dewey and Meade, and Bullmer' s idea is mainly from here. An overview of Blumer's contribution follows the assumptions of symbolic interactions and follows some discussion of Blumer's assertions on the discussion of the "root image" of subsequent Blumer's so-called symbolic interactions and the methodology related to empirical science Contains a summary of comments.