Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Justification of Defying Unjust Laws

In his famous article, "Letters from Birmingham Prison," "Martin Luther King, Jr. We quote conscience as a guide to defend fair laws and break unfair laws. Likewise, Henry David Thoreau writes in the famous article "People Disobedience". "People should do something that their conscience has told them, not following illegal laws, the positions of the two writers are very close, they use a common theme of conscience, they "We use a similar rhetorical attractive attitude." "Solos argue that men should act from a conscience.Solau said that if a conscience of a person says that the law is unfair , He thinks he is responsible for breaking the law.

He opposed other Americans who believe that most people should change the law first, because breaking the law is worse than doing unjust laws. Thoreau wrote that "It is better to break illegal laws." "Break the law, let your life be anti-friction against machines" (Solo, page 18). But Thoreau does not believe that people should be criminals. He believes that criminals are people who are in violation of the law, but we are not responsible. Thoreau thinks that he must do so if a person violates an unfair law. Therefore, you can see that he was in violation of the law because everyone was illegal. That person must accept what happens when he violates the law.

Thoreau wrote that if people want to change the law by breaking the law they will be willing to go to jail. Thoreau believed that the government spent money on unfair things, so he was in prison instead of paying taxes. This is how Henry Thoreau believes people can change unfair laws. If people are willing to go to jail and quit their jobs, the revolution occupies the place and he believes that reform will occur. Because of his conscience, Thoreau is willing to go to prison to change the law of illegality

King's position on the unfair law is very close to Thoreau's position on unjust enforcement. In his famous letter "Birmingham Prison Letter" written in prison, the King wrote in the Minister who did not like his protest.

Comparison of Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were sent to prisons because they violated their laws considering social injustice. These two are very different people, but they are about the same. Everyone has behaviors behind their own theory and inference, but their goal is always the same. No matter what the result, I believe that everyone believes in what they believe. - Merriam-Webster dictionary defines fraud as "unfair" characterized by fraud. At the same time, we define the law as "constrained custom or community practice". Today, people can see unfair legislation globally, many of which are ignored in most countries of the world. At the same time, the law is usually enforced in an unfair way.

Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. stated that in the name of unfair legislation in the famous article "Letters from Birmingham Prison", they comply with fair laws and illegally violate It was. Guide to the law. Likewise, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his famous article "civil disobedience" that people should do what their conscience conveyed to them rather than obey unfair laws. - Walden of Henry David Thoreau, The Into Wild of Jon Krakauer, and Grizzly Man of Werner Herzog talk about the story of a genuine man who decided on adventure to the wilderness. On the other hand, Chris McCandless (Wild), Timothy Treadwell (Grizzly Man), and Thoreau are similar in several respects. All three recorded a certain document on their journey; McCandless and Thoreau kept the journal while Treadwell kept the video log

Henry Thoreau's impact on Martin Luther King Henry David Thoreau was a great American writer, philosopher and naturalist in the 1800s and his work influenced his own life in the 20th century. Many famous leaders. Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord, Massachusetts in 1817 and later received education at Harvard University. These methods may include sit-in and parade. He believes that the role of citizens is to bring things in hand. It is because they must take action to bring about change. They have to take appropriate actions to express their concerns and achieve their demands. He expressed disappointment to the leaders of the church and stated that they should do more to ensure that few people do not feel stood up and discriminated.