Hate Speech is the Price We Must Pay for Freedom of Speech

I am living in the USA, we enjoy a lot of beautiful freedom and freedom. Most of these freedoms seem to be closely related to our lives, but most freedom comes from sacrifice and effort. Among all our rights, freedom of speech is one of our most valued things and may be one of the most controversial things. An annoying speech is one of the prices that we can buy to confirm that our presentation is free. But as the hatred's speech becomes more common, many people want to know that it is too much or the price we should pay.

The most common thing we say in the era of freedom of speech is silence. We are trying to calm our speech. I hate speech I do not like. But dislike of disliked words is a nasty word - we hate words! We dislike the speech. Just as words of hatred dislikes freedom, words of hatred including disliked words also dislikes freedom. I love to talk, I speak! I love freedom, freedom is exercising! Then you will challenge any hatred. Do you really have such a bad question? The only bad question is the question we do not ask - we should not be afraid of the truth, so we should pursue the truth. In search of the truth, it makes you free. No matter how dark the question is, the light will be with you. If you have a problem, do not be afraid to ask it - no matter how bad it looks. If we are enthusiastic and courageous after asking for it, there will always be problems.

First of all, the question of Professor Rosenbaum is as follows. Should the United States develop disliked speech to restrict freedom of speech? Rosenbaum says that the only reason why hatred speech is not censored and prosecuted in the United States is that speech does not cause actual harm and causes serious physical harm in comparison to hatred crime with attacks I think there is a possibility. However, Rosenbaum suggests that neurological evidence (none he has specifically cited) suggests that emotional pain may be as painful as physical pain Said.

Freedom of speech means enabling people with fundamentally different views to talk. But freedom of speech does not mean refusing to point out that people we do not agree are wrong, sometimes wrong. The detoxification of hatred and racist speech is not suppression but makes more remarks. When an individual or organization raises hatred, the government should respond, not through censorship, but through strong, direct and explicit discussion on aggressive remarks, and must do so. Freedom of speech means that the government can not ban or punish speech. This does not mean that the government can not judge the speech. Because judgment is the essence of politics