Harvesting Baby Theresa's Organs: Arguments and Ethics

The argument that we should not use human means is very important. It focuses on using things more than people. In other words, it is important not to treat people as disposable disposable items but to handle them in a way they want to handle them (Vendemiati, 2004). Society is focusing on self rather than society as a whole. By doing so, people regard themselves as people, regarded as means, not individuals to be respected. This is part of the reason for excessive violence and other problems of today.

But for Rachel it is important that it should not be sacrificed as a way to end others (Pojman, 2012). This discussion focuses on moral principles aimed at treating individuals as individuals. We insist that many people should sacrifice for the greater good of society as a whole, but others feel that sacredness is something else, and sacrificing to save others is unacceptable ( Solomon, 1984). If you do not select an organ of Baby Theresa, those organs can not save other organs. However, using organs like this will make use of babies as a means

Theresa Ann Campo is publicly known as 'Baby Theresa' and is a child without brains born in Florida in 1992. Children without brains are sometimes referred to as "babies without brains" because the brains are at the top because important parts without brains contain lack of brain and cerebellum. However, brain stems present in such babies enable autonomic functions such as breathing and heartbeat. Even for survival (even from stillbirth) these babies do not live long, and regardless of the period they live, they become still unconscious due to brain failure. Therefore Teresa 's parents volunteered to transplant her organs, and other children in need may benefit from Teresa' s eyes, kidney, liver, heart and lung after transplant. The doctor also believes that a good suggestion made by the baby's parents is that her organs are arbitrary.

In the case of Theresa's baby, we do not deceive or manipulate someone by removing the organs for transplant but we use her organs for the benefit of others. If you are thinking about it, this will happen each time you make a transition, and that is wrong. The transplant is done with the consent of people, and of course it should not infringe their permission. However, Theresa Baby can not express his opinion or express his wishes. Therefore, the complexity of the incident still exists. In addition, it can say that the baby Teresa does not have a desire first, she is not a truly independent person, as she can not make a decision for herself. Therefore, parents' decisions against her do not really infringe autonomy of others. This gives us two ways of thinking about the problem. It all comes down to one choice, it is to do what we think is the best.

So there may be reasons to believe that the life of innocent people can save many lives in order to solve the title of this article. It may even save the lives of other children, and people should not be used as a means to the end. Baby Teresa is not just providing organs, it can not allow her to provide organs. Killing someone is still a moral mistake. To harvest Teresa's organs means killing her. When her parents asked to donate her organs she was still alive so it was impossible to harvest her organs without killing her. Yes, she dies anyway, but she is still a living person (not yet classified as born) and should be treated like any other born baby