Hannah Arendt: Analyzing Judgement in The Life of the Mind

Many social philosophers and political philosophers tried to thoroughly study and decide the way people make decisions. It is necessary to understand the background and culture surrounded by philosophers before explaining and analyzing the conclusion of judgment pointed out by an important philosopher. Our idea is adaptive, opinions and values ​​are often determined by retrospective evaluation of social norms, political structures, and past experiences. In this article I will examine the judgment that Hannah Arendt studied and investigate the political distress that may affect her conclusions in detail.

Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx: The tradition of totalitarianism and Western political thought was the unannounced book by Hannah Arendt on the overall work of Marx and the first study of the integration project originally intended by Arendt. After "publication of totalitarianism" was published in 1952, Hannah Arendt began researching the "totalitarian element in Marxism" project. First of all, Arendt is considered to be a member of "Origin of totalitarianism" It did not complete the project, nor completed subsequent revisions "Marx's tradition and Western political thought". Tama Weisman tracked and evaluated this development as there are many gaps in the track from the announcement of "The Origin" in 1948 to the announcement of "Human Situation" in 1958. The thought of Arendt about Marx, how his idea is used for totalitarian purposes, and his position in the political and ideological traditions of the West

Hannah Arendt and the limitation of total control In recent years, the political philosophy of Hannah Arendt has played an increasingly influential role, the limitations of Hannah Arendt (Hannah Arendt) and "Holocaust, diversification, and resistance" It is closely related to understanding of principle. According to Arendt, the main purpose of totalitariy is complete control, the de facto exclusion of human justification, morality, personality, pluralism. In her view, this attempt is best reflected in concentration camps. The concentration camp is the main "laboratory" of the administration. Arendt focused on the logic and motivation of perpetrators, but Michal Aharony studied the views and experiences of the victims, and the ability to resist such experiments. In order to achieve this goal, Aharony has worked with famous nonclassical intellectuals and writers who survived the Auschwitz concentration camp and Bouhenwald concentration camp.