Hammurabi's Code: Just or Unjust? Essay

Mesopotamia, "land between rivers" is one of the greatest and oldest civilizations in the world. This civilization prospered around 3000 BC. In the fertile land between Euphrates and Tigris, it is now known as Iraq. Prior to 1792 BC, the ancient city state of Mesopotamia was not unified, and conflict often occurred in confusion and war. In 1792 BC Hampibi conquered and consolidated the neighboring Mesopotamian city state, founded the Babylonian Empire, became the sixth king of Babylon, the city of the Parliament House. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order and funded irrigation, defense and religious projects. He personally manages to take care of the government. See more

However, excessive strikes and humiliation in lower classes and lower class people, ie in public places, are very punished, often leading to death or ultimately part of the body being cut off. Furthermore, for the slaves that will strike others, they will eventually cut off his ear. Moses gathered the mosaic law between the 2nd and 3rd centuries derived from Judaism. There is no social difference in Moses' Law compared with Hamurabi's law regarding hitting or striking a person. People think that punishment for crime is equal. Under Moroccan law, compensation can be paid to the victim if the attack is moderate. This shows equality in justice instead of social class. In addition, Hammurabi's law is unfair because he was sentenced to death because he beat a person. Meanwhile, Rome

Laws and regulations have two main functions, promoting order and strengthening stability. Not all laws are the same. The difference depends on the influence of the ruler and the area where the law is enacted. Still, these laws have the same purpose. Like the code of Ashoka's pillars and Hammurabi. Ashoka's Law and Hammurabi's Law differ in social system, but they are related to technical concepts. The social aspects of Hammurabi and Ashoka's laws and regulations are very different.

The reason for considering the injustice of Hammurabi code is that it is unfair for the victim. When the victim feels discomfort to the law, the law is unfair. Article 213 is unfair. If he attacks the girl of a slave of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of the womb (child / fetus), he will pay 2 Shekel's silver. Those who think that the reason for this law is unfair is that the ninth article of Hammurabi Code says the same, whereas it is the daughter of a free person, and the daughter of a free person is Shekel than a slave girl Because it receives over things. . This proves that Hammurabi's law is unfair to slaves / victims.

Have you heard of or read the code on Hammurabi? The code part of the law is based on the concept of retaliation, paying all kinds of losses to the victim, or the concept of "eye for the eyes" and compensation. In fact, Hammurabi Code has enacted laws that are neither fair nor fair. This is the reason. First of all, Hammurabi Code has a fair law. When law helps innocent people, it is a good law to protect innocent people. For example, some people think that it is just one of Hamrabi's law 232. Law No. 232 states that "If a person's merchandise is destroyed, the builder should compensate all the people who were destroyed.If he was not building a house correctly and the house collapsed, I will build a house with my own money. " "This law is fair, as it punishes construction workers by not building houses correctly, which is fair, as it does not build houses correctly and does not punish builders, this is Hammurabi's great law.