Hamlet’s Failure

Through tragedy, Hamlet has a common element. In other words, Hamlet's role is not necessarily his behavior but his words. This is the result of his sacred blood, but his opinion is sometimes based on the moment and its role changes from the surrounding environment as its role exists. One example is to compare the idea of ​​Hamlet's death with Act 4 and its bill.

Many people think that Hamlet is a drama about innocence, so Hamlet could not take appropriate action. Perhaps more interestingly, the drama shows how much uncertainty is incorporated in our lives, how much unknowns are allowed when people act, or when evaluating each other's actions . The theme of action is directly related to the deterministic theme. How to take reasonable, effective and intentional actions? In Hamlet, the way of behavior is influenced not only by rational considerations such as necessity of certainty but also by emotional, moral, and psychological factors. Hamlet himself does not seem to believe this idea. In other words, he can even act in a controlled, intentional way. When he takes action he prefers to be blind, reckless and violent

There is no doubt about the degree of failure of Hamlet. In addition to his commitment to the death of Polonius, Ophelia and his classmates, the attempt to remove the Kingdom of the Danish villain has a simple and inevitable fact that it got worse than originally. It is a state. Foreigner Fortinbras started the game against the threat of the kingdom and eventually took it without firing. When Hamlet failed, Fortinbras succeeded. We should not get much comfort from the development of Hamlet ourselves. Thinking of his persistent atrocities against Ophelia and his arrogance to Gertrude, he is still in his emotional history stage, we still face some embarrassing moments at the end of the drama It is. Any suggestion that Hamlet is returning to this particular sanctuary from this voyage must resist. Here, I also won criticism of the 20th century