In Shakespeare 's Hamlet, the main character and tragic personality of the show have noticed that they can not follow speculative instructions with the retribution of King Claudius, but I know the reason for persuasive power. The reason for this delay is the tragic defect of Hamlet - he tends to think or reflect, not to impulse or act. Because of this flaw, Hamlet could not ignore the moral aspect of his behavior, "he became a purely meditating creature, he lost the original ability to act" (Coleridge, 343).
Shakespeare did not provide holistic philosophy for Hamlet. Instead he brought up some philosophical questions, but ... hey ... he did not provide an answer. The three main questions of Hamlet are as follows. How do moral people live in a corrupted world? How does intellect and sensitivity coexist with pain and suffering in the world? What does death mean? Question 1: How do moral people exist in immoral world? We already say that Hamlet is fighting good and evil, and almost everyone lives in a world that is helping this fight. However, Hamlet is against immorality, fraud, and dishonesty. So it is not a surprise that Hamlet is a little anxious about the world around him, he thinks it is dangerous and dubious.
There are many morally ambiguous persons in William ยท Shakespeare's "Hamlet", but there is no more embarrassment than Prince Hamlet himself. The Prince of Denmark Hamlet faced a hard task of revenge for his father's death and in falling into accepting this pursuit he fell into a situation where he had to commit unexplainable actions. When his father's ghost places the weight of his destiny on Hamlet's shoulder, Hamlet becomes a man who lives life in an eternal gray shadow, not life is no longer black and white. Hamlet is morally ambiguous. Because his behavior is considered morally wrong, but his motives are not.