H.B. Fuller is Not Morally Responsible for the Addiction of Street Children to its Resistol Products

At your discretion, HB Fuller is morally responsible for drugizing street children into their Resistol products. In my opinion, HB. Fuller is not morally responsible for dependence on the street children's Resistol products. The company has ethical responsibility only for these actions and their foreseeable harmful effects. (A) deliberately and freely enforcing or bringing on, and / or (b) this morally wrong person can not perform acting or stopping deliberately and freely, which is morally wrong.

Question 1: Is H. B. Fuller responsible for drug abuse of Street Children 's Resistol products? Do you agree with or oppose the social situation of Honduras and Guatemala? It eventually leads to misuse of HB Fuller products, is not it a product or corporate responsibility? Do you agree or disagree that the parent company is not responsible for the activities of its subsidiaries? Please explain the whole answer. a) H. B. Fuller is not responsible. Because they do not do anything else just because they are doing their own thing. They have the right to do what they want to do. Just as you go to a well, what can we do if a dog falls into a well? The company focuses only on adhesives production business. To maintain the company's position, they need to use the best chemicals. The company is responsible for maintaining quality

According to your judgment, H. B. Fuller is morally responsible for drugizing street children into their Resistol products. In my opinion, HB. Fuller is not morally responsible for dependence on the street children's Resistol products. The company has ethical responsibility only for these actions and their foreseeable harmful effects. (A) deliberately and freely enforcing or bringing on, and / or (b) this morally wrong person can not perform acting or stopping deliberately and freely, which is morally wrong.