Interpreting the big truth through the eyes of successful generations is necessary for today's generation to accommodate contemporary modern large facts. This information occurs in our modern society and is disseminated through events that can be easily associated with it. Quoting states that strong themes drawn in specific types of text need to be reorganized to maintain their relevance in modern society. Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" is a detailed example of a contemporary drama.
Interpretive analysis: Observations must be explained by the participants' eyes in social situations. Explanation must be done in two stages. At the first level, observe or experience this phenomenon from a subjective perspective of social participants. The second level can convey the reason why participants acted in their own way, to give a "brief explanation" about the phenomenon of interest or the meaning of the participant's experience to provide a rich story It is to understand.
Social science research: principle, method and practice Anol Bhattacherjee University of South Florida, abhatt @ usf.edu
The meaning is born in life. Interpreting neutral events through perceptual shots is subjective. "Truth" is only a product of perception, perception is colored by experience, then filtered by the current state of mind, and further changes. When a neutral event is treated this way, it is more realistic than fiction. But please accept the personal truth from the heart. In an excellent discussion about Miss, Katherine Schulz said: "Your miracle is not that you can see the world, this is where you can see the world, because it is not. "TED's speech" The point of her conversation is that we are not only mistaken, but do not know it at all. She learned the idea of filtering reality through ideas and prejudices; and it appeared on the other side, but it was considered as the truth
Regardless of whether it is concrete or universal, I recognize the truth and approve it to tell the truth of human thought. It does not see much heart through our eyes, but gathers general or special knowledge of the human mind through their similarity; but we think of the inevitable truth. How about individual thought, but it should be based on eternal type (De Trinitate, IX, 6, 9). All knowledge by the form is similar to what it knows. Therefore, regardless of whether we are satisfied with the format or whether they are dissatisfied with the poverty or not, thinking has some kind of similarities with the form that it knows. So, as we know him, we resemble God, but we do not respect him as much as we know him because we do not know him because we know him.