Currently there are many articles, scholarly publications, and books on issues related to leadership. Because this trend is very widespread, it is difficult to point out global values and practices related to truly effective leaders. However, some names work quite efficiently and are spreading around the world, so it's obvious. Bill Gates of Microsoft Foundation is the best leader and businessman of the century. Utilizing the big difference between his personal characteristics and the management qualities, he succeeded in drawing in the workplace that he can be defined as a great leader.
There is much content about this bill behind his success in the business world. To my knowledge, Bill Gates and Mr. Dhirubhai Ambani are two excellent leaders and there is no doubt that they have all the qualities to become excellent leaders. The quality and will of these people made him from anything
Comparing Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, they are quite different. Bill Gates leader and follower relationship style to Steve Jobs leadership style, both offer some of the world's most successful products. Although the style of each leadership may be completely different, all of them have one thing in common. It is enthusiasm and dedication to the innovation of computing technology. Steve Jobs only offered a set of ideas for the board, but he is still a genius of innovative design. In the process of trial and error, Steve Jobs learned lessons from his mistakes. With this process, Apple has been successful in the areas of mobile technology and personal computing. The difference between a good leader such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs is that you understand what you need compared to other CEOs.
Other great technical leaders also tend to like paranoia. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates' own versions, along with Andy Grove, have worked on the eternal lessons in strategy rules in three areas: Bill Gates, Andy Grove, Steve Jobs. In a book I strongly recommend, paranoia is used to explain the secret of Jobs and Gates' competitive business practices (such as Internet Explorer and Windows bundles). U.S. Federal Trade Commission ultimately called Gates' strategy 'anti-competitive' and 'exploitable', but Gates thought that Netscape is 10 times the turning point. In 1995, Netscape occupies 80% of browser market share and is becoming a Web-based operating system that can directly compete with Windows. Netscape earned only five million dollars early in 1995 (compared to Microsoft's 8B!), But Gates felt it was a threat to Microsoft's entire business.