Graffiti As Vandalism, Not Art

At the New York City Museum graffiti show, most graffiti are not displayed - scribble of the destroyer that is hard to understand

I held the latest exhibition entitled "City like Graffiti and Canvas" at the New York City Museum from the 1970s to the 1980s and praised graffiti and practitioners of that "work".

For those who believe that graffiti is celebrated at retrospective exhibitions of important cultural facilities, there is some evidence to prove that this view is contradictory.

A typical exhibition of "graffiti" of the current graffiti is seen in the building, the lower side of the east is covered with paint, it actually represents the so-called graffiti artist better. It was hard to see the old homemade stone building covered with paint. As these gangs attack our public property with their spray cans, markers and etching knife, the beautiful Queensbridge and stone carvings were cleaned and repainted

In the 1970s subway system, the impact of graffiti began to become serious and it was frustrating to get on the train. Almost all cars are covered with inexplicable paint and marking sedge. The station and the tunnel are as bad as well.

These vandalism do most tricks at the subway terminal and they can spend time marking as many vehicles as possible. Often they write each other's work to make it an ugly mixture

I am as irritated as outside in the train. It will allow you to really feel the fall around you

Because the threat of criminal activity continues, I do not want to use the subway, there is a real danger. Graffiti adds a layer of despair and fear, almost everyone is on the train, this is useless

"New York Times" criticizing local newspapers such as AP and NYPress.com praised her comment "When graffiti is great", made a serious mistake

In the graffiti days of New York in the 1970s and 1980s, life was at the peak of withering of the city

Yes, the graffiti "artists" exhibited in the MCNY exhibition are very talented. However, these "artists" appearing in the exhibition occupy a small part of people who pollute or destroy public property. They represent a few people with certain artistic talents, no matter how misleading these people are. This is a criminal act of public disturbing acts of public disturbing acts, and citizens really should find it regretfully.

The majority of graffiti consists of our building, civic statue, public transportation, highway, roof, tree, cemetery, mailbox, and other blank spaces where these destroyers got dirty little hands I committed it by talentless criminals.

Celebrating graffiti is an indication of how far we are as a society. It is a pity to open an exhibition to make this behavior beautiful.

Discussions continue on whether graffiti is an art or a vandalism. In most countries, marking or painting property without the owner's permission is considered destruction and destruction, which is a penalized crime. Mr. Peter Wallon, a city councilor in New York City, considers the approved graffiti as an art, but if it is done against the property of others it is a crime. He said "There is a message about the graffiti destroyer, your freedom of speech is over and my possessions begin." Meanwhile, Felix, a member of the group Reclaim Your City in Berlin, said that the artist is from the advertiser Masses will regain the city, graffiti shows freedom, making the city more dynamic. "If such art is a crime, please forgive me God!" - Li, a member of the five members of the mythical group

When discussing graffiti topics, the main problem for most people is whether graffiti is art or vandalism. Before answering this question, I still have many questions to answer. What is art with graffiti? What is vandalism? There are small graffiti with destructive graffiti, and if so, who decides where? For the first time after answering these questions, someone can judge exactly whether it is art or vandalism! Art is art (painting, sculpture, music, etc.) focuses on creating beautiful objects. In these three categories of art, each category has more subcategories. There are also arts in other categories such as architecture, photography, digital art. The main problem of art is that it is a wide range and is generally thought to be in the eyes of bystanders.