Government Funding of The Fine Arts

The faint cathedral and marble sculptures in the city, bookshelves continue to be true to classical literary works and performances, so art has proved to be durable. For a long time these creatures provided immortal proof of human achievement and became windows of the past. Perhaps there is no other art category that is more appropriate for history than the art or luxury art, tradition, and well-preserved work that has been carefully designed to withstand a period of time.

But first of all, what do we use to express the word "art"? Here, Mortimer Adler will provide us the first place. Adler pointed out that art is first and foremost useful in his book "What do you think about a wonderful idea?" Thus, we do not mean that art is worthless - that is a totally different concept. On the contrary, for works that do not belong to the category of art, do not fall into the possibility of suggesting the word "useless". This is because it is not mentioned here. As I have cleared this, I can outline some of the boundaries that I can not regard as art, almost everything I learned at school in mathematics. In fact it is absurd to propose to calculate derivative, change rate, geometry, logarithmic derivative etc. and perform arithmetic calculation In fact, this statement says mixed paint and paint themselves belong to the same category It is equivalent to that.

As a teacher I know that the two main factors leading to the lack of art education are money and time. As people pay more and more attention to mathematics and literacy skills and standardized tests, art became the first course to be cut from school budgets and courses. Considering the relationship between literacy and music, pointing to rhythm, and the close relationship between speech recognition and reading, this is disappointing. As a nation, we should focus on making these experiences more, rather than making our students easier to learn. As long as we do not decide the method of raising funds, we will cut art education

Art managers have the ability to create and manage professional development needed for art teachers. Due to the lack of funds allocated by the government, the development of art profession is often inadequate, which can be supplemented by the lobbying of art manager.

There is no clause in the US Constitution that requires the government to use taxpayer money for artistic expression. However, if the government chooses to fund art, it must do it in a manner consistent with the first amendment, ie the decision to finance will agree with the information the government is to express in that field If not so, senior government officials can use the taxpayer's money to fund projects that support their views. But government funds are not unlimited, obviously not all art funded applications are available. Therefore, government agencies must have some discretion in choosing where and how to allocate funds for art. How much discretion the government has in discretion of art funds has been discussed before.