Google: Don’t Be Evil

Since its founding, the importance of the Internet as a means of acquiring information has increased. This is because it has not been reviewed like other mainstream media in the USA, such as TV, newspaper, radio. However, the issue of censorship posed many controversial issues not only in the United States but around the world. Some believe that Google is violating Google's self-proclaimed motto that violates "not being a motto of evil", thinking that it is not evil, so some people will benefit from it. Before the economic interests of the company.

The Internet is not the first network to change everything forever. In 1910, under the guidance of Theodore Vail, AT & T monopolized nationwide telephone lines. Like Google's early "banning" policy, AT & T at Vail, like Larry and Sergey, contributes to the public interest. At the time, people thought AT & T had the same technology as Google of today. Telephones, radios, televisions, and movies all begin with a freely accessible network. Now they are a closed system managed by monopoly and cartel

Google did not give up "not doing evil". As part of Google's Code of Conduct, "Do not do bad things, because the alphabet does not give it up or adopts the entire code of conduct, it also applies to Google," David Thank you and Oletros. Please do not choose cards because it is not based on facts

But is it evil? In a recent Atlantic article called "evil", Ian Bogst believes Google's mistake is "evil". This is because they do not cause the program to run, but prevent the program from being effectively created and maintained. The company's non-malicious position is essentially not a commitment to morality but a commitment to the advancement of technology (Bogost is also not welcome Wikipedia is "unwelcome; computation as harmful / evil in case of programming "It is a bad practice that can hardly be said that most people understand it as" evil. "Probably it is not entirely evil.

Google basically defines a number of "bad" definitions that contain the same idea. According to Google, evil is "quality of moral error". This is a good foundation for the definition of evil, is not it worse than what Google explains? People always want goodwill to overcome evil, but this does not always happen. There are a number of factors that can determine the final result, and some more questions to answer. "Is nature evil?" "Can you force evil to others?" "Do you have various degrees of evil?" William · Shakespeare's "King of the Lears" It is a dominant theme. We were not born of evil. You can not learn through experience through evil, but you can not engage in evil behavior by being influenced by others from other people. Evil is the quality of moral error, but the degree of evil is varied. In King Lear, evil and its scope are indicated by letters.