Good Citizen vs. Good Man

A good citizen is not the same person as a good person or a good citizen. It can be said that one can not say about the other. A good person must be a good citizen. But for a good citizen, becoming a good person is not important. This distinction is important as it helps people understand that good people have far better quality than good citizens. Good citizens do their best for the community and his city. He is a good citizen as long as he does not harm the surrounding environment and care about his city's improvement and improvement.

The considerations already mentioned as to whether the good virtue is the same as the good virtue proves that in one state the good and the good citizens are the same but the other states are different. If they are the same, every citizen is not a good person, but a politician, a person working alone or with other people or engaging in public relations with others. The Constitution is to place magistrates, especially the Supreme Court, in the state. The government is full of sovereignty of the state, the constitution is actually government. For example, in democratic countries people are the best, but in oligarchy there are a few people; therefore, we say that these two forms of government are different.

Aristotle chose to find a difference between a good citizen and a good citizen by studying and analyzing their virtues. His conclusion is as follows. "Therefore, the virtue of citizens must conform to his constitution, so it is clear that virtue is not a good citizen's good, if there are multiple constitutions.The only virtue: the complete virtue goodness If you do not get the virtue expressed by people, you may become a good citizen. "(1276b). Aristotle did not tell me who is better. Being a good citizen or being a good person is more satisfying Good people are better than good citizens.