Good and Evil at School: Bullying and Moral Evaluation in Early Adolescence

We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Lead to Four Factors to Evaluate Hypothesized Bullying: Evaluate the DF of "evil spirit", "contempt", "timid" and "degeneracy" and the assumptions of 5 factors: " Universal dream, "courage" "cool" "sympathy care" and "justice". The result is "Corruption" bullying assessment used with bullying Positive correlation assumption and victims and "universal praise", "positive correlation between defending side assumed to move.MANOVA show, each group 2 evaluation scale, performance state (Bullying, victims, defenders and participants) premised on bullying "and" fair and justice terms "moral evaluation has important influence, fictitious The moral evaluation of the defender did not have a significant effect

Route ledge. From: Taylor & Francis, Inc. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Phone: 800-354-1420; FAX number: 215-625-2940; Website: http: // www. tandf.co.uk/journals

Summary: Despite the high prevalence of bullying among young people, a little is known about the use of alcohol and bullying the relationship between perpetrators and victims. This study used a random sample of data from a two-stage representative Florida 44532 middle school teenager. We seek high prevalence of bullying (30% of the body, 52% verbal, 12% of the network). Students involved in any type of bullying (21%) higher than the percentage of students, using alcohol not involved (13%). Students involved as bullying victims and victims compared to the past 30 days are more likely to use students as alcohol not involved in bullying. The results show that bullying behavior can be related to alcohol use, early assessment of bullying behavior can be part of a young teen drinking prevention program.

We examined how teenagers (the sixth grade, N = 357) to evaluate virtual bullying and defend the hero, and these evaluations are conducted morally with their companions about nomination Whether it is bullying or not. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Lead to Four Factors to Evaluate Hypothesized Bullying: Evaluate the DF of "evil spirit", "contempt", "timid" and "degeneracy" and the assumptions of 5 factors: " Universal dream, "courage" "cool" "sympathy care" and "justice". The result is the use of "bullshit" bullying assessment with bullying Assuming positive correlation assumptions and defenders who assume victims and "universal praise", "moving care" and "love terms of fairness and justice" are positive correlations I will evaluate.