Dr. Craig appeared in the long-running John Anchorberg show and mentioned all five reasons for believing that God exists.
Quotation of "God" (or "supernatural") as an explanation of something that we have not explained, namely "God of Gap" as a theologian proved by the origin of Christianity, a false argument As an example. Dietrich Bonhoeffer talks best (please emphasize me): How wrong is to using God as a stop loss for our incomplete knowledge. Indeed, when the frontier of knowledge is further postponed (necessarily so), God is pushed back and therefore retreats. We do not want to know, but I want to find God in what I know.
There must be reasons that can not be explained to argue about the existence of the universe, and God or the universe must be eternal. Therefore, there is neither an explanation about God nor an explanation about the universe. Big Bang is not an explanation, it is an explanation, there is no explanation why it will be. Then we have to rely on opportunities and accidents. God is better suited to this picture. Why does the universe need explanation? That argument is not an argument. Of course the existence of the universe is strange for many people and they certainly appreciate the explanation. Does anyone seek sufficient explanation to make it a reasonable question? If this question can not be answered, this is the answer, and that does not make it a reasonable question. It is like asking which particular atomic group constitutes the first self-replicating organism on the planet. Even if the answer can not be answered, this is a rational question.
The existence and faith of God have long been the subject of intense debate. Most of the existence of God explicitly explains the nature and origins of our universe and the lives of human beings. In all the history of human history, we could not find a definitive answer to the confusion problem about this change, but the belief in the existence of God remains pitiful and unnecessary explanation . In this discussion, God refers to the standard comprehensive Christian god, but it applies to any metaphysical supernatural entity. Sites 1 and 2 assert the fact that there was no evidence of the existence of God. It can be obvious, observable, or can be duplicated. I am convinced that at least the first two are absolutely reliable. Remember, I am not trying to prove that God does not exist, I am not trying to prove that putting faith in entities without physical evidence is irrational.