Go Givers vs. Go Getters: Review of The Go Giver

In a conversation with his recent friend, he regrets that people will not introduce the business to him unless he mentions something to them.

A few days later, when I was at Barnes & Noble, I thought about that conversation, I noticed "Go - Giver: a small story about a strong business idea" by Bob Go and John David Mann (Penguin Portfolio, 2007). When I browsed these pages, the book solved the problem - "exchange terms" related to the business. The idea in the book seems very interesting, I am very happy to receive a copy of the comment.

Reading, The Go-Giver, like my favorite book, uses stories and metaphor to explain the main points of the book. It provides a "dry" story, a salesman named Joe, who decided to contact "slum" to help him acquire the account.

The story itself is legible and provocative and provides anecdotes and information that leads to "five rules of stratosphere success". The details of the story are necessary to understand each law; that is why I do not believe to destroy the author's livelihood by suggesting five ways here:

Law of Value: Your real value depends on the value you provide than the value you pay.

Compensation Act: Your income will depend on the number of people you serve and the level of your service.

Law of Impact: Your influence depends on you making the interests of others the top priority.

Even though you think you are like me and you think you are the enlightened person, this book provides ideas to guide your business and life to the next level.

I recently introduced a strategic partner to a competitor, but I have a relationship with this person, but she wants to do business with me. I know that the competition is better suited to what she needs.

Although I did not charge a part of the service fee required for new customers, I decided to offer these services free of charge as a value added service. It quickly set the tone for the client and made it possible for me to start our relationship with a solid footing.

I offered a job that does not have any desire for someone or that I expect him to help me (anyway I will do this, but this is a concept in books)

Give or give: Give this book and get it for your bookshelf. You will gain the gratitude of the person you gave, and you will always mention it. More Content: Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises 11 Comments ▼

Whenever you meet new people, tell them about their work and ask them to tell you what they need to know to send customers or customers. Then, as soon as possible, see if you can send any business in the way they are. Please become a "concession" instead of an executive. Try to find a way before you start thinking about how to get it out. If you are always doing what famous entrepreneurs or successful businessmen do, there is no world in the world that will prevent you from leading to a big business success. You are the architect of your own destiny. You are a master of your own destiny. You are behind the handle of your own life. In addition to what you can do, there are no restrictions on what you have or what you do, restricting what your own ideas will bring to yourself.

This is because there are two types of providers. Nonselfish providers and "other" providers. Selfless devoted people do their best to help others, at the expense of their own work, and ultimately be the end result of success. In addition to giving to others, other donors also pay attention to their interests. Another approach can maximize the benefits of becoming a donor while preventing harmful factors (burned or used by the recipient). The other donors eventually become the apex of success

There are groups of people who are purely selfless, and they constantly put the interests of others in their own interests. However, there is another group of providers I call "others". They are worried about bringing profits to others, but they also put their own interests on the rearview mirror. They will find a way to help others who have low cost themselves or have a high interest in themselves, that is not a convenient situation for both, but 'favorable for both sides'. This is ironic. As a rule, a selfless servant continues to promote the interests of others, so it may become a more selfless person. But my data and many other studies show that they are not so tolerant in fact because they lose resources to exhaust up their energy, run out of time and basically do not take good care . "Other" donors can maintain donations by reducing more donation or finding ways to benefit.