Global solidarity, migration and global health inequity.

In recent years, the reasons for global solidarity have been theoreticalized and conceptualized, and many believe that we need the concept of global solidarity. However, the question remains. What stimulates the efforts of the international community and the nation state? Our focus is to lay the foundation for solidarity for global health inequality. We will explore which factors can promote global solidarity in the context of healthy immigration and outline the possible forms of this solidarity. Firstly, we believe that the only rational conceptualization of people highlights their interdependence. We use the concept of people as "ecological discipline" and explain the fact that such concepts mean the movement of nurses from middle to low income countries to more rich countries. Next, I will introduce potential critics who may oppose the current international politics understanding through insight into real political science and realistic international political theory. We believe that governments can still promote global solidarity through cautious discussions, even though not always, for ethical reasons. As many people believe, solidarity is not necessarily a function of charitable trends, or is not an unfair treatment approval, but in reality it may be useful for national and international interests. Because we are sufficient to motivate governments to intervene and cross-border interdependence, the global solidarity is to help deal with global health inequality I conclude that it can be conceptualized.

But the problem is not that simple. Although not clear, incorporating Schwalbe's editorial is a further level of corruption within the global health leader. There are many people, and inequality always crosses. Yes, most global health leaders are men (although Sue Desmond-Hellman, who runs Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is not actually their first female CEO.) However, global health care Leadership is almost old.

In recent years, the reasons for global solidarity have been theoreticalized and conceptualized, and many believe that we need the concept of global solidarity. However, the question remains. What stimulates the efforts of the international community and the nation state? Our focus is to lay the foundation for solidarity for global health inequality. We will explore which factors can promote global solidarity in the context of healthy immigration and outline the possible forms of this solidarity. Firstly, we believe that the only rational conceptualization of people highlights their interdependence. We use human concept as "ecological discipline" and explain the fact that such concept implies the movement of nurses from low to middle income countries to more rich countries.

INTRODUCTION International immigrants are a powerful symbol of global inequality in terms of wages, labor market opportunities and lifestyles. Millions of workers and their families aim to reduce the gap between what they think of themselves and the people of the richest region each year and cross the border and the continent It crosses over. On the other hand, in the field of development, consensus is rising that immigration is an important livelihood diversification strategy for many of the world's poorest countries. Seasonal movement is a very important phenomenon in most parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. However, it is clear that immigration - especially international immigration - is an activity that brings significant risks and costs. However, immigrants are not always the poorest people, they do not necessarily benefit, and other factors are not the same.