Poverty has become an important fact in the world and has a great influence on economic development. Foreign aid from wealthy areas is working to reduce poverty. Before we delve into the debate, we need to clarify the terms "Western European countries" and "world poverty". Western countries are the most advanced countries with the highest standard of living for most residents, such as the United States, European countries, Australia. Global poverty in this paper can be defined as lack of access to fresh water, medical facilities, education, or very limited access (Sumner, 2011, the Internet). This article will demonstrate that Western countries are not working so hard to support the development of poor countries.
Furthermore, according to Ross statistics, 85% of wealth is dominated by 20% of the wealthiest humans (Firebaugh, 2000, 160). From another point of view, the income distribution model must be imbalanced, so poor people can not afford to buy food. In addition, as Holst pointed out, Americans spend $ 11 billion on ice cream every year and American families waste a quarter of the food each year (2006, 197). The public's perception of food protection is the most important in Western countries and it turns out that it may help to raise the awareness of helping the poor. As Shah observes, if the first world uses 0.7% of its total national income each year for effective external aid by 2015 (the Internet in 2010), food poverty will be halved. This means that it is realistic that Western countries provide aid to the poor, but they are not actively involved in this behavior. In addition, poverty and malnutrition will survive if foreign aid efforts are focused only on food. For this reason, Western countries need to study to improve the quality of the food being served or to add more nutrients to these foods.
Secondly, education is important for improving living standards and eradicating long-term poverty. Western countries can provide development
The Oxfam report is a good example. The world's heavyweight anti-poverty charity organizations are shouting inequality of wealth, not poverty. The latest report on India has produced usual fuss and shows that 1% of the wealthiest Indians have accounted for 73% of the country's wealth creation. This article is particularly related to Oxfam's mistake with India. To understand this, we have to start with basic understanding. In the majority of human history, everyone is basically poor and living a self-sufficiency life. survive. They may be a few people at the top of a food chain that leads a better life, but even if they are awkward and barbarous and living a short life, there is a decent standard of living that we will talk about today There is hardly any. . If we could even get a somewhat long historical curve, this is a kind of understanding that can not be ignored.
In order to confirm the above argument, this paper examines the structural causes of serious global poverty and the influence of poverty on agents. As farmers point out that the poor in the world is the main victim of structural violence, poverty is a typical example of structural violence leading to structural infringement of human rights. Their pain 15. The poor agents are seriously injured and their actual satisfaction with basic human needs is considerably lower than the potential ability. Examining the status of the poor can explain the unequal suffering of human rights violations caused by the difference in power exercise through the global economic and social structure.
In the context of the philosophical debate about the world's poverty, the idea that poverty is a violation of the human rights of the poor has gained great attention. The rationale based on the right of fundamental concern for our poverty is that it violates human rights in a moral sense. Moral obligations are grounds for legal rights and grounds for institutional justification. In cases where poverty is regarded as an infringement of human rights (Pogge 2007, Gewirth, 1983, 2007, Ashford 2007; Cruft, Liao and Renzo, 2015), it is a right released from poverty as it constitutes an important feature of human life.