The strategy for George Orwell's 1984 Oceania party's complete control of the population was similar to the strategy he adopted during the reign of Joseph Stalin. In fact, the strategy adopted by the Oceania Party depicts Stalin's cruel totalitarian society in Russia. Establishing a relationship between Stalin's Russia and his older brother Oceania, each party exercises social psychological and physical manipulation by controlling information and language with the help of technology.
George Orwell wrote in 1948 that he is a political satire against the totalitarian state and a Stalinist criticism. Orwell himself was a socialist hit by a sniper bullet fought for the Republican Party during the Spanish Civil War. Orwell began to be disappointed, as the West noticed the fear of Stalin. 1984 is a future warning story by Orwell in the world of world governance defined by anxiety, hatred, and atrocities. The heart of the party is called a "brother" in honorific title, and oversees survival through ubiquitous surveillance and mental control. If my older brother said 2 + 2 = 5, the citizens they are conquering should not only accept it, but also believe it. When the adventure of Winston began, he went out from a slow and terribly established trace, felt the surroundings, pierced hypocrisy, and looked for the truth. It was a pain he found
The common theme of George Orwell in 1984 and the society of today "Big Brother watch over you" (Orwell 5). This simple expression is the cornerstone of dialogue between conspiracy theorists. George Orwell may write a warning novel in 1984, but he could hardly predict how close his novel is to reality. Over the past 50 years the world has become more dangerous. - George Orwell's typical negative utopia in 1984 George Orwell can say that George Orwell is his most famous novel and it is one of the most powerful warnings of totalitarian history history It continues to be one. For his life experience, George Orwell is mainly a political novelist. In Spain, Germany and Russia, Orwell witnessed the danger of absolute political authority in the era of advanced technology and strictly explained its danger in 1984.