George Carlin and Radio Censorship

George Carlin and Radio Americans hate to find out words. It burns fire to anyone who claims to be people. But the review is bad or wrong. Censorship system is an important part of social stability. One of many types of reviews is done on television broadcasts. Comedian, George Carlin, Howard Stern, Mirko Muller have great influence on censorship in this era, and I am trying to prove that the Federal Communications Commission has no right to review radio broadcasts.

Since 1934, the radio and television operated under the license granted by the Federal Communications Commission and are not subject to review. In 1978, at the Pacifica v. FCC, the radio station broadcasted "George Carlin 's Seven Dirty Words" and his son was at ca, r and complained. The Federal Communications Commission acted and filed a lawsuit against a company responsible for the Pacifica radio. The Supreme Court endorsed the Federal Communications Commission 5-4 and announced the privacy of harmful harmful substances entering the house through this broadcast. Due to the aggressiveness and obsceneness of the dialogue, this limits the initial revision of protection. The Supreme Court later decided that in 1996 commercial television stations were able to ban the reproduction of obscene material, but public television stations were unable to ban the cable television stations.

Freedom of speech (prose) Pacifica is a radio station that played a 12-minute monologue of comedian George Carlin in 1978. According to Carlin, this 12-minute monologue "dirty discourse" is composed of "the public TV broadcast can not say anything" (qtd of the article). This has caused one of the most controversial cases in the history of broadcasting. It then sets the standard that can be said wirelessly and can not. It is clear that most of Stern's content is not an example of unauthorized content materialized in Pacifica's ruling. On the other hand, the ambiguity of precedents may mean that some or all of Stern's conversation is legally "obscene". Like the definition of "obscenity" in 1973 (including seven curses), the Supreme Court rejected the publication of the definition of "obscene" content.